Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  133 / 648 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 133 / 648 Next Page
Page Background

Safety and environmental standards for fuel storage sites

Final report

131

Architectures of overfill protection systems

New tank automatic overfill protection system

10 Automatic overfill protection systems for a new tank should meet the requirements of

BS EN 61511 and paragraphs 5 to 9.

11 The following architecture shows an independent automatic system, which will operate to shut off

product delivery to the tank without any human action.

Figure 33

High-high level trip

12 Figure 33 shows a new tank fitted with a high-high trip sensor (independent from any other

tank instrumentation) connected to a logic solver and a fail closed valve. This arrangement should

meet the requirements for SIL 1 and may meet the requirements for SIL 2. PFD calculations and

conformity to hardware fault tolerance require checking. (See Annexes 1–3.)

Existing tank installations

13 Where there is an existing overfill protection system to a standard other than BS EN 61511, a

gap analysis should be conducted to determine the extent of compliance with BS EN 61511.

14 For SIL 2 or higher safety requirements the installation should fully comply with BS EN 61511.

15 For SIL 1 safety requirements, improvements to existing systems may still be necessary

to meet ALARP even in cases where it is not reasonably practicable to upgrade or replace

existing systems to fully meet the requirements of BS EN 61511. The following issues should be

addressed when considering what improvements are required:

The degree of independence of sensors used for the high-high alarm/shut-off.

The suitability of the logic solver.

Degree of independence from BPCS.

Demonstration and evidence of prior use.

Suitability of final elements.

16 It should be noted that a prescriptive description of the steps needed to meet BS EN 61511

so far as is reasonably practicable cannot be provided in this guidance. The degree of compliance

should be discussed and agreed between the dutyholder and the CA on a case-by-case basis.

However some further more detailed points for consideration are given below, and in Annex 4.

17 Figure 34 illustrates the use of a motor operated valve/electrically operated valve (MOV/EOV)

as the final element within an overfill protection system.

‘Final

element’

fail closed

Fuel feed from:

-

rail

-

ship

-

process

Actuator

Logic

solver

‘Sensor’

high-high trip

L

New tank