Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  46 / 648 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 46 / 648 Next Page
Page Background

Safety and environmental standards for fuel storage sites

Final report

45

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

Fire resistance Cost**

Poly-ethylene

(HDPE)

Resistant to water,

––

hydrocarbons and most

chemicals

Requires protective layer

––

Potential hidden

––

problems around seals

and penetrations

Base ground to be

––

prepared well, ie remove

stones, requires a layer

of gravel and sand/

geotextile before the liner

Requires specialist

––

installer to weld joints

Very Low

––

Burns readily if

––

unprotected

Medium

Poly-propylene

(PP)

Resistant to water and

––

oils

Easier to lay than HDPE

––

Limited resistant to fuels

––

Requires protective layer

––

Potential hidden

––

problems around seals

and penetrations

Base ground to be

––

prepared well, ie remove

stones, requires a layer

of gravel and sand/

geotextile before the liner

Requires specialist

––

installer to weld joints

Very Low

––

Burns readily if

––

unprotected

Medium

Synthetic

rubber and

EPDM

Resistant to water

––

Not resistant to oils and

––

fuels

Requires protective layer

––

Very Low

––

Burns readily if

––

unprotected

Medium

** Costs are indicative and may vary based on installation issues and scale.

Fire resistance and integrity of pipe penetrations and expansion joints

176 The COMAH Containment policy states that: ‘Bunds shall have fire resistant structural

integrity, joints and pipework penetrations.’

177 Improvements should be made to the fire resistance of bund joints and penetrations where

the existing arrangement has inadequate fire resistance. Options for enhancing fire resistance of

new designs and existing situations where reasonably practical if the risk is tolerable are covered

in the following sections.

178 The objective is to retain the integrity of a bunded area as long as possible in the event of a

fire. Concrete and clay have inherent fire resistance, but the risk of a loss of integrity is provided

by joints and penetrations to the bund walls and floors and the way these features are sealed.

179 Sealants are now available which have enhanced fire resistance. The fire-resistance standards

commonly referenced are BS 476-20:1987

34

and BS 476-22:1987.

35

The maximum fire resistance

quoted in BS 476 is four hours.

180 Tests of fire rated and non fire rated joint sealants in combination with steel plates indicate

that fire rated sealants provide improved fire resistance.

181 In considering the use of fire-resistant sealants, due regard should also be given to the

suitability and compatibility of candidate products (for example hydrocarbon and water resistance)

in the specific application.

182 Waterstops are integral design and construction features of concrete structures whose

duty is to retain liquids. Good practice for the minimisation of leakage from concrete bunds

includes the use of waterstops within movement joints, in accordance with BS 8007. In order to