Safety and environmental standards for fuel storage sites
Final report
92
Societal Risk assessment
44 The scenario of an explosion following a tank overflow may contribute significantly to the
societal risk associated with an establishment. If this is the case, then the scenario should be
included in the Societal Risk assessment within the safety report for the establishment. As
described in the HSE COMAH SPC/Permissioning/12:
‘Societal Risk is the relationship between frequency of an event and the number of people
affected. Societal concern includes (together with the Societal Risk) other aspects of
society’s reaction to that event. These may be less amenable to numerical representation
and include such things as public outcry, political reaction and loss of confidence in the
regulator, etc. As such, Societal Risk may be seen as a subset of societal concern.’
45 Assessing a scenario in terms of the numbers of potential fatalities does not address
all aspects of societal concern, but is an indicator of the scale of the potential societal
consequences. The fatalities may be onsite and/or offsite. Other aspects of societal concern are
outside of the scope of this risk assessment guidance.
46 A scenario with the potential for more than ten fatalities may contribute significantly to the
level of Societal Risk from the hazardous establishment. Therefore the scenario should also be
considered as part of the safety report Societal Risk assessment.
47 A scenario with the potential for ten or less fatalities may not represent a significant Societal
Risk and a judgment will need to be taken over its inclusion.
48
Reducing risks, protecting people
provides one Societal Risk tolerance criterion, that the
fatality of ‘50 people or more in a single event should be regarded as intolerable if the frequency
is estimated to be more than one in five thousand per annum’ (paragraph 136). This risk criterion
is applied to a ‘single major industrial activity’ as a whole, where a single major industrial
activity means an industrial activity from which risk is assessed as a whole, such as all chemical
manufacturing and storage units within the control of one company in one location or within a site
boundary.
49 There is currently no nationally agreed risk tolerance criterion to determine when the level of
Societal Risk is ‘broadly acceptable’. This assessment is site-specific, and would therefore need to be
performed for the establishment as part of the safety report demonstration and agreed with the CA.
50 LOPA is not normally used to assess Societal Risk because a Societal Risk assessment
typically requires the evaluation of a range of scenarios. This is typically carried out using
quantified risk assessment techniques such as fault and event trees. There is no universally
agreed method of presenting the results of a Societal Risk assessment, but commonly used
methods include F-N curves and risk integrals.
Scenario-based environmental risk assessment
51 There are currently no published environmental risk criteria for Great Britain with the same
status as those for safety in
Reducing risks, protecting people
. Information on tolerability of
environmental risk has also been produced for options assessment in section 3.7 of
Integrated
Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) and Environmental Assessment and Appraisal of BAT
IPPC H1 Version 6 July 2003.
63
The tolerability criteria from this reference is summarised in matrix
form in Table 9 below. Further guidance on environmental risk matrix can be found in Annex 5 of
HSE’s SPC/Permissioning/11.
64
52 Dutyholders seeking to demonstrate compliance with the COMAH Regulations should adopt
an approach consistent with the information provided in Tables 9 and 10 and with that in their
COMAH safety reports and pollution prevention control permit applications.




