Previous Page  50 / 56 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 56 Next Page
Page Background

156

JCPSLP

Volume 14, Number 3 2012

Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology

Acknowledgements

We want to extend our thanks to all the speech

pathologists who referred their clients to the study – we

couldn’t have done it without you!

References

Beal, D. S., Gracco, V. L., Lafaille, S. J., & De Nil, L. F.

(2007). Voxel-based morphometry of auditory and

speech-related cortex in stutterers.

Neuroreport

,

18

(12),

1257–1260.

Brown, S., Ingham, R. J., Ingham, J. C., Laird, A. R., &

Fox, P. T. (2005). Stuttered and fluent speech production:

An ALE meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

Human Brain Mapping

,

25

(1), 105–117.

Chang, S. E., Erickson, K. I., Ambrose, N. G.,

Hasegawa-Johnson, M. A., & Ludlow, C. L. (2008). Brain

anatomy differences in childhood stuttering.

NeuroImage

,

39

(3), 1333–1344.

Cykowski, M. D., Fox, P. T., Ingham, R. J., Ingham, J.

C., & Robin, D. A. (2010). A study of the reproducibility and

etiology of diffusion anisotropy differences in developmental

stuttering: A potential role for impaired myelination.

NeuroImage

,

52

(4), 1495–1504.

Foundas, A. L., Bollich, A. M., Corey, D. M., Hurley, M.,

& Heilman, K. M. (2001). Anomalous anatomy of speech-

language areas in adults with persistent developmental

stuttering.

Neurology

,

57

(2), 207–215.

Fox, P. T., Ingham, R. J., Ingham, J. C., Hirsch, T. B.,

Downs, J. H., Martin, C., … Lancaster, J. L. (1996). A

PET study of the neural systems of stuttering.

Nature

,

382

(6587), 158–162.

Neumann, K., Euler, H. A., von Gudenberg, A. W.,

Giraud, A. L., Lanfermann, H., Gall, V., & Preibisch, C.

(2003). The nature and treatment of stuttering as revealed

by fMRI: A within- and between-group comparison.

Journal

of Fluency Disorders

,

28

(4), 381–410.

Preibisch, C., Neumann, K., Raab, P., Euler, H. A., von

Gudenberg, A. W., Lanfermann, H., & Giraud, A. L. (2003).

Evidence for compensation for stuttering by the right frontal

operculum.

NeuroImage

,

20

(2), 1356–1364.

Sommer, M., Koch, M. A., Paulus, W., Weiller, C., &

Buchel, C. (2002). Disconnection of speech-relevant brain

areas in persistent developmental stuttering.

Lancet

,

360

(9330), 380–383.

Watkins, K., Gadian, D. G., & Vargha-Khadem, F. (1999).

Functional and structural brain abnormalities associated

with a genetic disorder of speech and language.

American

Journal of Human Genetics

,

65

(5), 1215–1221.

Watkins, K., Smith, S. M., Davis, S., & Howell, P. (2008).

Structural and functional abnormalities of the motor system

in developmental stuttering.

Brain

,

131

, 50–59.

Yakovlev, P., & Lecours, A. (1967). The myelogenetic

cycles of regional maturation of the brain. In A. Minkowski:

(Ed.),

Regional development of the brain in early life

(pp.

3–70). Oxford: Blackwell.

children as young as possible in our current project, we

hope to gain a better understanding of the neurological

markers of stuttering present in the early years.

Our research

During the last three years Libby Smith (PhD student) has

been working with Professor Sheena Reilly and Dr Angela

Morgan from the Murdoch Childrens Research Institute at

the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne and Dr Alan

Connelly from the Brain Research Institute to investigate

brain activation and brain structure in children who stutter.

The specific aims of this project are to describe

differences between children who stutter and typical

speakers in three areas:

brain activation during speech

brain anatomy of the speech areas

white matter fibre pathways that connect different

regions involved in speech motor processing.

The data collection phase of this project is now complete.

Participants (15 children who stutter and a control group of

18 children with typical speech) attended two appoint­

ments. The first involved speech, language, and IQ

screening to accurately determine the presence or absence

of stuttering and ensure the children had no concomitant

speech, language, or cognitive issues. The second

appointment was the MRI scanning session where a series

of functional and structural MRI images were acquired.

Strengths and challenges

We found that most children enjoyed having a brain scan

because they could keep some pictures of their brain to take

home and show their friends and they were able to bring a

DVD to watch while most of the pictures were being taken.

Nonetheless, scanning young children has presented

us with significant challenges. It is important to make

sure the children understand the task they are required

to perform during the functional imaging scan. For this

study, children were required to listen to short sentences

through earphones, and then either listen only, or repeat

the sentence out loud, according to the instructions. The

children rehearsed the task using practice items outside the

scanner before the session. Each picture took somewhere

between 2 minutes and 8 minutes to acquire. During this

time the children needed to keep their head extremely still,

otherwise the images would be “blurred”. They could “have

a wriggle” between pictures, but the whole session could

take up to 1 hour. These factors placed limitations on the

age of children who could participate. While it would have

been interesting to include children from the age of 3 or 4

when they first begin to stutter, most children this young

would not be able to cope with the demands of the task

or to stay still for the required amount of time. In this study

we included children aged between 5 and 10 years. Most

children find it easier to keep still when they are watching

a DVD; however, some children will have difficulty lying still

regardless. Up to 25% of our data was discarded in the end

due to excessive movement.

What’s next

We are now in the process of analysing the data and are

looking forward to seeing the results. While this is a small

study in neuroimaging terms, it signifies an exciting step in

the quest to unlock the mysteries of the stuttering brain. We

also hope the results will contribute to advancing the

long-term goal of developing treatments that consider the

underlying mechanisms of developmental stuttering rather

than simply addressing the symptoms.

Libby Smith

is a PhD student in the Childhood Communication

Research Unit at the Murdoch Childrens Research Institute and

The University of Melbourne. She has a Bachelor of Arts/Bachelor

of Science and a Master of Arts (Neurolinguistics).

Correspondence to:

Libby Smith

phone: +61 (0)3 9936 6588

email:

libby.smith@mcri.edu.au