Background Image
Previous Page  142 / 552 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 142 / 552 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Philadelphia – 2015

140

4 - Morning Commute Management Considering Commuters’

Aversion to Credit Loss

Mohammad Miralinaghi, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN,

47906, United States of America,

mohammad.miralinaghi@gmail.com

, Srinivas Peeta

Under the tradable credit scheme, this study analyzes commuters’ departure time

choices considering their aversion to credit loss. The analysis helps in determining

credit price to manage morning commute congestion. The existence and

uniqueness of the equilibrium credit price are investigated and a linear model is

developed to obtain system optimum credit allocation and charging schemes.

5 - Effect of Glare on Shoulder-mounted Guide Sign Visibility

Mohammed Obeidat, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS,

66502, United States of America,

moh2001ie@yahoo.com

,

Malgorzata Rys

Glare is a serious concern in roadway safety during nighttime driving. Shoulder-

mounted guide sign visibility will be evaluated under presence of glare in a field

experiment using different retroreflective sheeting. Several variables will be

considered. Data will be analyzed statistically to determine the significant

variables that contribute to sign’s visibility.

SD63

63-Room 112B, CC

Nicholson Student Paper Competition II

Cluster: Nicholson Student Paper Competition

Invited Session

Chair: Mark Squillante, IBM Research, Thomas J. Watson Research

Center, 1101 Kitchawan Road, Yorktown Heights, NY,

United States of America,

mss@us.ibm.com

1 - Nicholson Student Paper Competition

Illya Hicks, Rice University, 6100 Main MS-134, Houston, TX,

77005, United States of America,

ivhicks@rice.edu

This session highlights the finalists for the 2015 George Nicholson Student Paper

Competition.

SD64

64-Room 113A, CC

Value of Information

Sponsor: Decision Analysis

Sponsored Session

Chair: Debarun Bhattacharjya, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center,

1101 Kitchawan Road, Rt. 134, Yorktown Heights, NY, 10598,

United States of America,

debarunb@us.ibm.com

1 - Balancing Research and Funding Needs: Value of Information and

Portfolio Tools for Nano Risk Decisions

Matthew Bates, Research Engineer, US Army Corps of Engineers,

Engineer R&D Center, 696 Virginia Rd, Concord, MA, 01742,

United States of America,

Matthew.E.Bates@usace.army.mil

,

Jeffrey Keisler, Niels Zussblatt, Kenton Plourde, Ben Wender,

Igor Linkov

Nanotechnologies are economically and technically promising yet pose risks.

Research may identify risks and paths to make technologies less hazardous or

more acceptable. Given limited resources, funders need to prioritize research

efforts. Current prioritization is done primarily thorough committee or executive

decision. We apply value of information and portfolio analysis techniques to

develop an efficient frontier of hazard research sets across three prominent

nanomaterials (Ag, TiO2, MWCNTs).

2 - Scoring Rules, Value of Information, and Sensitivity Analysis

Victor Richmond Jose, Georgetown University, 544 Hariri Bldg,

37th & O Sts NW, Washington, DC, United States of America,

vrj2@georgetown.edu

, Emanuele Borgonovo, Gordon Hazen,

Elmar Plischke

Scoring rules & value of information (VOI) are useful tools in decision analysis

that measure the information content of data. In this talk we bridge these two

seemingly separate areas of research. We obtain analytic expressions for VOI

associated with some scoring rules and show that the resulting VOI sensitivity

measures are global sensitivity measures that fall in a common rationale. We

study this common rationale & obtain conditions that characterize properties of

these sensitivity measures.

3 - Valuing Data: A Closed Form Solution for the Expected Value of

Sample Information

Adam Fleischhacker, Assistant Professor Of Operations

Management, University of Delaware, 222 Lerner Hall, Newark,

DE, 19716, United States of America,

ajf@udel.edu

,

Pak-wing Fok, Mokshay Madiman

We present a method for valuing sample data prior to its collection. This valuation

is given in closed-form and is flexible enough to mimic multiple decision making

contexts. Compared to existing techniques, it provides tighter estimates of

information value, insight as to the conditions under which data is valuable, and

insight into the amount of data required to achieve certain levels of value.

4 - Preference Elicitation Schemes, Random Utility Models and the

Value of Information

Debarun Bhattacharjya, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, 1101

Kitchawan Road, Rt. 134, Yorktown Heights, NY, 10598, United

States of America,

debarunb@us.ibm.com

, Stephane Deparis

Behavioral research indicates that when posed with preference elicitation queries,

people provide inconsistent responses that depend on contextual factors. Random

utility models have been proposed as a potential way to represent such

inconsistencies. In this talk, we introduce a hierarchical Bayesian approach where

the system is uncertain about the noise in a decision maker’s responses to queries,

and present a methodology to compute the value of information from various

elicitation schemes.

SD65

65-Room 113B, CC

Decision Analysis in Procurements and Procurement

Auctions

Sponsor: Decision Analysis

Sponsored Session

Chair: Janne Kettunen, Assistant Professor, The George Washington

University, 2201 G Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20052,

United States of America,

jkettune@email.gwu.edu

1 - Evaluating Technology Readiness for Adoption and Integration at

Navy Installations

Eva Regnier, Associate Professor, Naval Postgraduate School, 699

Dyer Road, Monterey, CA, 93943, United States of America,

eregnier@nps.edu,

Robert Barron, Daniel Nussbaum

While the DOD has adopted and adapted NASA’s technology readiness level (TRL)

definitions in many contexts to measure its technologies’ progress, the

achievement of high TRL levels has not necessarily led to adoption operationally.

We propose a measure of the progress in removing specific barriers to technology

adoption and integration in Navy installations that includes criteria for technical

readiness, as well as stakeholder acceptance and removal of barriers to

procurement.

2 - Scheduling Procurement Auctions

Janne Kettunen, Assistant Professor, The George Washington

University, 2201 G Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20052, United

States of America,

jkettune@email.gwu.edu,

Young Kwak

We derive conditions when scheduling procurement auctions impacts

significantly on their expected costs. To help the procurement auction owner in

scheduling the auctions, we develop a non-linear integer programming model,

which we reformulate as a mixed integer programming problem to make it

computationally amenable. We apply the model for the Florida Department of

Transportation procurement auction data. Our results indicate that the optimal

schedule can provide substantial cost savings.

3 - Decision Analysis Concepts in Public Procurement

Jay Simon, American University,

jaysimon@american.edu

Decision analysis can play a significant role in helping carry out public

procurement effectively. Public procurement decisions often require assessing

preferences over multiple attributes. There may also be uncertainty regarding one

or more elements of the process. Recent work has examined some of the unique

challenges in public procurement, and how decision analysis techniques can be

used to improve outcomes.

4 - On the Inefficiency of Multiattribute Auctions for Post-Auction

Produced Goods

Gregory Kersten, Prof, Concordia University, 1455 De

Maisonneuve Blvd. W, 1450 Guy Street, Montreal, Qu, H3H 0A1,

Canada,

gregory.kersten@concordia.ca

Multiattribute auctions are used to procure heterogeneous products. If they are

produced post-auction, then the price and other attributes are interrelated and

the assumption of the buyers’ and the sellers’ quasi-linearity utility does not hold.

The implication is that while winning bids may be efficient solutions the auctions

are inefficient mechanisms. The inefficiency and the possibility of improving the

winning efficient bids via the side payment is illustrated with Cobb-Douglass

economy.

SD63