Previous Page  327 / 432 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 327 / 432 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

OCTOBER 1994

traditionally perceived to have little

knowledge of the areas of individual

psychology or family behaviour.

There is, of course, no official form of

specialised training forjudges in the

area of family law. I felt the paper was

perhaps unduly uncritical in dealing

with this area and did not refer to the

many complaints (justified or

unjustified) about, for example, the

lack of consistency by the judiciary in

the application of family law, and the

equal lack of consistency by lawyers

representing family law clients, some

of whom adopt a conciliatory

approach while others adopt a very

adversarial approach.

Recommendations

Chapter 7 deals with conclusions and

provisional recommendations, and is

very hard-hitting. It is, I think,

worthwhile to quote substantially

from this Chapter.

"We must begin this chapter by

expressing concern about a range of

serious problems and defects in the

manner in which family cases are

handled within our existing court

system . . . Many of the problems are

derived from under-resourcing, both

physical and human. The picture

which emerges is one of a system

struggling and barely managing to

cope with the very great increase in

family litigation in recent years.

The

result is a sad parody of that which

might be expected in a State whose

Constitution rightly places such

emphasis on the protection of family

life."

(Paragraph 7.01)

"Of major concern are the impossibly

crowded lists in many Circuit and

District Courts, leading to a wholly

unsatisfactory situation in which

judges are being forced to make the

impossible choice between brief and

hurried hearings or intolerable delays.

The situation is particularly acute in

the Circuit Court outside Dublin

wherein some venues a judge may

face a list of as many as 70 cases in

one day . . . the quality of justice is

affected . . . the physical conditions of

many courts outside Dublin are not

appropriate for family cases . . . the

absence of proper waiting room

facilities sometimes leaves opposing

spouses to confront one another

seated on benches in cold and

draughty corridors.

Adequate

facilities for consultations between

lawyers and their clients are rare and

some of the court rooms display a

Dickensian squalor.

By contrast the

modern facilities in Dublin offer a

model of what a family court can be".

(Paragraph 7.02)

While I certainly agree with the

criticism of the courts outside Dublin, I

think perhaps that undue credit is given

to the Dublin facilities which are still

inadequate for consultations, as a visit

to Dolphin House will prove. All too

frequently the family High Court is not

used and the High Court judge hearing

family law cases sits in one of the civil

courts in the Four Courts building.

Regional Family Courts

Chapter 8 provides a summary of

provisional recommendations, the main

one being the establishment of a system

of regional family courts, functioning as

a division of the Circuit Court, having a

unified family law jurisdiction, and

being located in 8 to 10 regional

centres, presided over by specially

nominated Circuit Court judges, and

operating in the context of a range of

support and family services. It is

welcome to know that it is

recommended that proceedings under

the Child Care Act, 1991 be taken under

the wing of the regional family court. I

wonder, however, if the Commission

should not have gone further and

recommended that criminal proceedings

against children should also be dealt

with in the family courts. It is common

case that many children get into trouble

with the law because of family

breakdown and it may be very useful

indeed forjudges who have expertise in

the family law area, to deal also with

children who infringe the criminal law.

Personally I feel that there should be

further discussion as to whether the

regional family court should have the

status of the Circuit Court rather than

the High Court. I often wonder why

family law always has to be relegated

to second place behind, for example,

company law. Why should family law

cases, where sometimes millions of

pounds worth of property is involved,

be forced down to the Circuit Court

while all company law petitions go to

the High Court and are welcomed

there. Once more it would appear that

property is valued more than children.

A further consideration is that if the

regional family court, on the level of

the Circuit Court, is not given full

resources, then there will be no

written judgements and therefore no

uniform jurisprudence. It is

noteworthy that although it is nearly

five years since the 1989 Act came

into operation, very few written

judgements have been delivered under

the Act, presumably because most of

the litigation under this Act takes

place in the Circuit Court, where

judges are overburdened and are

under-resourced.

A welcome recommendation is that

attached to every regional family court

there should be a family court advice

centre, providing an information and

referral service, offering information to

clients about counselling and

mediation services, social welfare

entitlements and services, legal aid and

advice services as well as basic

information about the operation of the

family court and remedies available

there. It is recommended that the

advice centre have available various

information packs, carefully designed

and consumer friendly.

Independent Monitoring

Although the Consultation Paper states

that the family proceedings should

continue to be heard

in camera,

there is

an interesting recommendation that

provision should be made for access to

family proceedings by an approved

independent person or persons whose

function it would be to monitor family

proceedings, gather statistics and report

publicly from time to time on the

functioning of family courts.

Bona fide

researchers and students of family law

should, at the discretion of the judge,

be permitted to attend family

proceedings. I wonder if the Paper

should not have gone further to

emphasis the importance of

monitoring, statistics gathering, and the

production of judgements. Personally I

would suggest the establishment of a

person or body charged with reporting

fully on the operation of the family

303