GAZETTE
NOVEMBER 1994
Sub-section (v) provides:
that where an instrument operates, or
is deemed to operate, as a voluntary
disposition inter vivos under the
provisions of section 74 of the
Finance (1909-10) Act, 1910, or
section 24 of the Finance Act, 1949,
such fact shall be brought to the
attention of the Commissioners in the
statement delivered under the
provisions of sub-section (2) and such
statement shall contain a statement of
the value of the property, or in the
case of a lease the minimum amount
or value referred to in the said section
24, and where the requirements of this
sub-section are not complied with any
person who executes such instrument
shall for the purposes of sub-section
(3) be presumed, until the contrary is
proven, to have acted
negligently.
In a nutshell, this duty of disclosure
means that if a solicitor is aware that
his client is in any way fraudulent or
negligent (example - receiving
payments under the counter) he has a
duty to disclose the relevant facts to
the Revenue Commissioners.
Likewise, if a solicitor has a strong
suspicion that there is something
about the transaction which is not
correct, he appears to have a duty also
to enquire further. When presenting a
deed a solicitor has a responsibility to
ensure that the deed recites the
relevant facts.
Having dealt broadly with the general
provisions contained in Part (iv) of the
Finance Act, 1991 we now come to
consider what impact this has on the
area of deeds of assent and deeds of
family arrangement:
Under the Stamp Act, 1891 no stamp
duty is payable on any deed of assent
where property is vested in the
persons entitled under the deceased's
will or on intestacy, unless such
assent is executed under seal in which
case it will be liable to stamp duty
of £10.
Where there is a deed of family
arrangement however, or where there
is a variation of either the terms of the
will or the shares on intestacy, a
stamp duty liability can arise on any
deed executed for the purposes of the
passing of any interest in land.
Previously, some practitioners used to
take the view that it was not
obligatory to stamp such deeds of
family arrangement, where a form of
assent in favour of the nominated
party (parties) was lodged in the Land
Registry, on the basis that the personal
representatives could be confident that
the settlement would never need to be
relied upon, or if relied upon that it
could be stamped at a late penalty.
This viewpoint was always
questionable. The reason that this
viewpoint was taken in Land Registry
cases was that where a deed of family
arrangement is completed, the Land
Registry do not actually register the
deed of arrangement but are only
concerned with the form of assent
duly executed by the person named in
the Grant of Representation, i.e. The
Land Registry do not look behind the
deed of assent and accept the deed of
assent on face value and register the
new owner in accordance with the
terms of the assent. The fact that the
deed does not have to be submitted
to the Land Registry does not remove
the obligation on practitioners to
stamp it.
Any deed of assent or deed of family
arrangement which confers a benefit
on someone other than those provided
for under the will or intestacy of the
deceased will incur stamp duty
liability on the consideration passing,
or if there is none such or less than
full consideration passing, on the
value of the property passing as a
voluntary disposition.
Failure to disclose the full facts and
circumstances (for example - by
executing a simple Land Registry
form of assent and making no
reference in the deed to the "true
circumstances") will invoke the
penalty provisions of section 97 of the
Finance Act, 1991.
As stated previously, the duty of
disclosure imposed on the
professional adviser - i.e. for our
purposes the solicitors for the personal
representative - means that it is
absolutely essential that solicitors
acting in the administration of an
estate ensure that the appropriate
stamp duty is paid on all deeds of
assent and deeds of family
arrangement and that there is no
collusion with the beneficiaries or
successors for the non-payment of
same.
On a practical point when a deed of
family arrangement has been executed
and duly stamped, a declaration of
solvency by the persons releasing
their interest should also be prepared
and kept with the deed along with a
certificate of discharge from CAT and
a declaration for the purposes of
The Family Home Protection Act,
1976.
Another point which should be kept in
mind where a deed of family
arrangement is involved concerns
Capital Gains Tax. The question is
sometimes asked whether the
dispositions by the various parties
give rise to CGT. Section 14(6) of the
Capital Gains Tax Act, 1975 applies
where a deed of family arrangement is
made within two years of the date of
death. Section 14(6) provides as
follows:
"If not more than two years, or such
longer period as the Revenue
Commissioners may by notice in
writing allow, after a death any of
the dispositions of the property of
which the deceased was competent
to dispose, whether effected by will,
or under the law relating to
intestacies, or otherwise, are varied
by a deed of family arrangement or
similar instrument, this section shall
apply as if the variations made by
the deed or other instrument were
affected by the deceased, and no
disposition made by the deed or
other instrument shall constitute
a disposal for the purposes of
this Act."
Deeds of Assent/Deeds of
Family Arrangement - An
Alternative Approach?
Disclaimers
Some of you may already be aware of
the ongoing controversy
re
a possible
alternative to deeds of family
arrangement. I am considering under
this heading the situation
re
disclaimers.
310