Previous Page  397 / 432 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 397 / 432 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

AUGUST/SEPTEMBER

1994

In

Poetic Justice

above, the poet

refers to litigants who found that on

leaving the courts, their stories were

preserved for posterity in the law

reports. The litigants may never have

understood fully the reasons why, (the

barristers and solicitors may not have

foreseen the consequences) but they

all did add to the law of the land. It

would be a trite cliché to say that

1992 was an exceptional year for law

cases; every year presents its own

surprises. Yet few will forget the

X

Case - Attorney General

v.

X

[1992]

ILRM 401; [1992] 1 IR 1 [1992]; 2

CMLR 277. Miss X, a 14 year-old

girl, a victim of sexual abuse, decided

with her parents she would go to

England for an abortion. The Attorney

General sought an injunction

restraining her from leaving the

jurisdiction and having an abortion.

The Supreme Court held by a

majority of four (Finlay CJ,

McCarthy, O'Flaherty and Egan JJ) to

one (Hederman J) that Article 40.3.3

permitted abortion where there was a

real and substantial risk to the life, as

distinct from the health, of the mother

which could only be avoided by an

abortion. The authors note that the

analysis and holding of Finlay CJ,

McCarthy, O'Flaherty and Egan JJ

"provoked an outpouring of public

controversy and legal and political

assessment".

The authors, Raymond Byrne,

barrister, lecturer in law at Dublin

City University and editor of

The Irish

Law Times

and Professor William

Binchy, Regius Professor of Laws at

j

Trinity College, Dublin, are part of a

body of critics ever on the watch. The

authors criticise the opinions of the

Supreme Court in the

X Case

and of

judges in other cases.

Í A celebrated judge noted that he

remembered with a sense of great

relief, "of an incubus cast aside",

! when he passed his final examination

in law school. That was a chapter

closed. He might make mistakes in the

future but he would no longer make

them under the eyes of examiners

charged with the special duty of

exposing his failings and giving them

a quantitative value in comparison

with his virtues. Exposure, he said,

would be a matter of chance. "A class

of professional detectives would no

longer be on his tracks". The judge

continued by stating that once on the

Bench you may think you are safe.

Alas, it is not so! The examiners still

crowd about; the writers and

commentators in the law schools and

in the universities are waiting at

the door:

"Let there be a joint in your armour,

a flaw in your opinion, it will not be

long before probe and scalpel will

expose a gaping wound. The

examiner is near at hand".

The writer of this notice has sympathy

and understanding for the judges who

must decide cases quickly without the

benefit of the leisure of some scholars

in their study. Nevertheless, we

should welcome the increasing

influence of the extra-judicial

agencies - the scholars and

commentators in the universities and

other institutes of learning.

Vinogradoff in

Common Sense in Law

tells us that in former times the

practice was followed by German

Courts "of sending up the documents

of a case to the law faculty of a

university of some standing" - in

order to obtain a consultation "as to

the proper decision". It is by analysis

and criticism together with intellectual

honesty that the law will grow in

respectability. We owe a debt of

gratitude to Raymond Byrne and

Professor Binchy.

The

Annual Review

is a treasury of

scholarship and practical guidance.

The authors are masters of juristic

thought. But let no one consider that

this is an esoteric publication. Issues

from employer's liability, schools'

negligence, liability for dogs - matters

of everyday significance for lawyers -

i to pre-incorporation contracts and

liquidator's powers to ratify them are

all considered by influential

commentators in a lucid and

: impressive manner.

Dr. Eamonn G. Hall

N e w Pub l i c

Re l a t i o ns

E x e c u t i ve

a p p o i n t ed

Catherine Dolan

has been appointed

by the Society as Public Relations

Executive and Editor of the

Gazette.

She took up her position Monday,

14 November 1994. She is formerly of

Park Public Relations, Merrion

Square. Catherine came first in the

DIT Graduate Diploma in Public

Relations in the College of

Commerce, Rathmines. She obtained a

Distinction and won the Public

Relations Institute Award for the best

PR student and the Marketing Opinion

magazine award for best overall

student. She has worked both in the

public and the private sector. She has

an Honours Law Degree from Trinity

College Dublin which she obtained

while working in Dublin Corporation,

Planning Department. She also spent

some time working with McCann

FitzGerald, Solicitors.

English Agents:

Agency work

undertaken for Irish solicitors in

both litigation and non-contentious

matters - including legal aid. Fearon

& Co., Solicitors, Westminster

House, 12 The Broadway, Woking,

Surrey GU21 5AU.

Tel: 0044-483-726272

.

Fax:

0044-483-725807.

373