Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  45 / 56 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 56 Next Page
Page Background

45

Enforcement on the ground

Generally speaking, apes are captured in traps, through the

use of drugged darts, poisoned bait, or traditional hunt-

ing methods. Apes are also captured while they raid crops,

and infants are sometimes captured by hunters looking for

bushmeat. Because these activities are so dispersed, patrols

intending to encounter and arrest poachers are unlikely to be

successful, although they can act as monitoring of the activi-

ties that threaten great apes, such as logging, mining, and the

setting of fires and traps.

There are however traditional anti-poaching tactics that can be

applied. When trappers carry out reconnaissance, set or check

traps, and transport the live apes, they tend to leave behind trail

signs, often leading from the trap directly to the suspect. Fol-

lowing these signs can help to uncover the identity of the buy-

ers and traffickers, either through police questioning or, more

effectively, through surveillance.

It is also important for law enforcement efforts to focus on the

sale of apes in markets, streets, on the Internet, or through or-

ganized wildlife traffickers.

CONCLUSION: PROTECTING

GREAT APES – CHALLENGES

AND OPPORTUNITIES

Customs and anti-smuggling

As the transportation of live wildlife is far more complex than

the smuggling of drugs, ivory or rhino horn, the chances of

interception are much higher. The most appropriate option

is for national customs authorities to establish special anti-

smuggling units that work in cooperation with criminal intel-

ligence units, to investigate all forms of contraband by inspect-

ing non-commercial flights from smaller airstrips that are not

subject to regular inspections. Similar units should be tasked

with monitoring road traffic and river traffic, and to regularly

inspect boats and vessels at major ports.

Organized crime and investigation

Because wildlife trafficking is a trans-boundary issue, a coher-

ent international effort is needed in order to effectively address

it. The ICCWC was launched in 2010 to meet this demand, and

began by focusing on the illegal tiger trade (

see page 13 for more

information on the ICCWC

).

Indeed, a structure to combat illegal wildlife trade is, in princi-

ple, no different from the one needed to combat any other form

Unless the ban on illegal trade of wildlife is enforced according to the CITES Conven-

tion, it is likely to continue unchecked. Indeed, action is required by CITES, the Par-

ties to the Convention, the national and international law enforcement community, as

well as national prosecutors if wildlife trafficking is to be tackled effectively. Currently,

seizures are predominantly made at customs check points or when arranged by NGOs,

and because enforcement mechanisms are not in place anywhere else along the trade

chain, these seizures have proven to be ineffective in combating the trade.