Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  307 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 307 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S294

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

dose levels (24 Gy, 30 Gy and 36 Gy all in 3 fractions) using

a time-to-event continuous reassessment method design.

Pazopanib was continued post-radiotherapy as

maintenance therapy until disease progression.

Results

Thirteen patients were enrolled, with a median follow-up

of 19 months. Their median age was 66 years, with 54%

male and 46% female patients. No dose-limiting toxicities

were noted at dose levels 1 or 2. Of 7 patients at dose

level 3, 1 patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity

consisting of grade 4 hypoglycemia. Grade 3 to 4

pazopanib-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 38% of

patients (8%, 0%, 32% for respectively dose level 1, 2 and

3).

Table:

Treatment-related

adverse

events

Local control was achieved in all irradiated lesions, we

noted a complete local response in 1 irradiated lesion

(8%), partial response in 6 irradiated lesions (46%), and

stable disease in 6 irradiated lesions (46%) as best

response. Mean duration of local control was 23 months

(95% confidence interval 16 - 31). Assessment of responses

outside the radiation field revealed that 5 of 13 patients

(38 %) developed a partial response, 7 patients (54 %) had

stable disease and 1 patient (8%) had progressive disease

as best response. Median progression-free survival (PFS)

was 6.7 months (95% confidence interval 3 - 10).

Figure: Local control of irradiated lesions and distant

response of non-irradiated lesions: best response

Conclusion

SBRT in combination with pazopanib treatment is well-

tolerated with long-term local control and favourable

response rates outside the radiation field. Larger trials are

needed to study the impact of the combination on overall

survival and PFS.

PV-0551 PSMA PET/CT vs MRI for GTV delineation in

prostate cancer: a comparison with histology

C. Zamboglou

1

, V. Drendel

2

, C.A. Jilg

3

, H.C. Rischke

1

, B.

Teresa I.

4

, T. Krauss

5

, M. Werner

2

, M. Bock

6

, M. Langer

5

,

P.T. Meyer

4

, A.L. Grosu

1

1

Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Department of

Radiation Oncology, Freiburg, Germany

2

Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Department of

Pathology, Freiburg, Germany

3

Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Department of

Urology, Freiburg, Germany

4

Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Department of

Nuclear Medicine, Freiburg, Germany

5

Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Department of

Radiology, Freiburg, Germany

6

Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Department of

Radiology- Medical Physics Division, Freiburg, Germany

Purpose or Objective

The exact delineation of the intraprostatic tumour burden

is crucial for treatment planning in primary prostate

cancer (PCa). We compared

68

Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT

with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for gross tumour

delineation in patients with primary PCa based on slice by

slice correlation with histopathological reference

material.

Material and Methods

Patients with histopathologically proven primary PCa

underwent

68

Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT (n=10) and MRI

(n=7) followed by radical prostatectomy. Resected

prostates were scanned by ex-vivo CT using a special

localizer and prepared for histopathology in a customized

cutting device. Invasive PCa was delineated on a HE

stained histologic tissue slide and matched to ex-vivo CT

to obtain gross tumor volume (GTV-)histo. Ex-vivo CT

including GTV-histo and MRI data were matched to in-vivo

CT(PET). Consensus contours based on MRI (GTV-MRI),

PSMA PET (GTV-PET) or the combination of both (GTV-

union/-intersection) were delineated. In each in-vivo CT

slice the prostate was separated into 4 equal segments

(total 340 segements) and sensitivity and specificity for

PSMA PET and mpMRI were assessed by comparison with

histological reference material. Furthermore, the spatial

overlap with GTV-histo was measured. In the case of

multifocal PCa (4/7 patients), SUV values (PSMA PET) and

b-values (diffusion weighted MRI) were obtained for each

lesion.

Results

GTV-histo was detected in 225 of 340 segments (66%).

Sensitivity and specificity for GTV-PET, GTV-MRI, GTV-

union and GTV-intersection were 75% and 87%, 70% and

82%, 82% and 67%, 55% and 99%, respectively. GTV-histo

had on average the highest overlap with GTV-union

(57±22%), which was significantly higher than overlap with

GTV-MRI (p=0.016) and GTV-PET (p=0.016), respectively.

In every patient with multifocal PCa there was one lesion

which had both the highest SUV and the highest b-value

(mean and max), which was always the largest lesion in

histology.

Conclusion

68

Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI showed high

sensitivity and specificity in detection of primary PCa. The

combination of both methods performed even better in

terms of sensitivity (GTV-union) and specificity (GTV-

intersection). A good spatial overlap with GTV-histo was

observed for PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI alone which was

significantly improved by GTV-union. Further studies are

warranted to analyse the impact of these preliminary

findings for therapeutic (focal therapy) strategies in

primary PCa.