Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  485 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 485 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S470

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

S.H. Jeon

1

, S.Y. Park

1

, J.H. Kim

1

, J.I. Kim

1

, J.M. Park

1

1

Seoul National University Hospital, Radiation Oncology,

Seoul, Korea Republic of

Purpose or Objective

To suggest an optimal planning target volume (PTV)

margin in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of the

spine.

Material and Methods

From December 2014 to July 2016, 40 patients received 42

fractions of SBRT for spinal tumors to thoracic or

lumbosacral spines using a volumetric modulated arc

therapy technique and patient immobilization. Before

treatment, kilovoltage cone-beam CT (CBCT) images were

obtained for a 4 degrees of freedom (DoF) correction of

patients alignment (translation + yaw). After corrections

were made, additional CBCT was acquired just before

treatment delivery (pretreatment CBCT). Immediately

following SBRT, CBCT was acquired again (posttreatment

CBCT). Residual setup errors for pretreatment CBCT was

determined by a 6 DoF manual matching. Intrafraction

motions were calculated as differences in errors between

pretreatment and posttreatment CBCT. Three clinical

target volumes (CTVs) were generated by translating and

rotating original CTV by residual setup errors alone

(CTV_R), intrafraction motions alone (CTV_I), and residual

setup errors and intrafraction motions combined

(CTV_R+I), respectively. Adding various uniform margins

to original CTV generated PTVs. The impact of PTV

margins on CTV coverage was evaluated. A provisional

criterion of adequate CTV coverage was that PTV

encompasses at least 97% of CTV.

Results

Time interval between pre-treatment and post-treatment

CBCTs was 6.8±2.5 min (mean±2SD). The 2SD values of

lateral, vertial, longitudinal translations and pitch, roll,

and yaw were 0.7mm, 0.8mm, 1.1mm, 1.7°, 1.1°, and

1.6°for residual setup errors and 1.0mm, 0.9mm, 0.9mm,

1.1°, 0.8°, and 1.1°for intrafraction motions,

respectively. Without margins, PTV showed adequate

coverage for CTV_R, CTV_I, and CTV_R+I in 48% (20/42),

71% (30/42), and 48% (20/42) of fractions, respectively.

With 1-mm uniform margins, PTV was adequate for 95%

(40/42), 98% (41/42), and 100% (42/42) of fractions,

respectively. 2-mm uniform margin was adequate in all

fractions for all three CTVs.

Conclusion

With appropriate immobilizations and 4DoF corrections, a

uniform 1-mm PTV margin may ensure an adequate CTV

coverage in most treatment sessions of spine SBRT.

Combined with a shortened treatment time, the small

extent of intrafraction motions may obviate the need of

treatment interruption for additional intra-session image

guidance. Despite perfect 6 DoF patient alignment, 1-mm

PTV margin is still needed to address intrafraction

motions.

PO-0864 Accuracy of fiducial based correction of target

motion in prostate SBRT treatments

T. Viren

1

, M. Korhonen

2

, J. Seppälä

1

1

Kuopio University Hospital, Cancer Center, Kuopio,

Finland

2

University of Eastern Finland, Department of Applied

Physics, Kuopio, Finland

Purpose or Objective

Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)

incorporating a fiducial based motion tracing system has

enabled almost real-time correction of intra-fraction

motion of a prostate during SBRT treatments of prostate

cancer. However, the effect of number and positioning of

the fiducials and the amount of prostate movements on

the accuracy of the treatment has not been reported. The

aim of the present study was to investigate the accuracy

of the fiducial based correction of target motion in

prostate SBRT treatments and to evaluate the effect of

fiducial number and positioning to the accuracy of the

fiducial tracking.

Material and Methods

CT image was acquired from custom-made phantom

incorporating different fiducial configurations (Fig 1).

Subsequently, typical prostate SBRT treatment plan

(5x7.25Gy) was calculated in the phantom using treatment

planning software (Ray Tracing algorithm, Multiplan,

Accuray, USA). To measure the dose distribution within

the phantom calibrated Gafchormic films (4 x 4 inch,

Gafchromic EBT

3

, RPD Inc., USA) were placed inside the

phantom. A prostate treatment was irradiated in three

different phantom positions: no movement, typical

clinical prostate movements, and maximum movements

allowed by the automatic fiducial tracing system (Fig

1).The phantom movements were conducted using

Robochouch (Accuray, USA).To mimic the suboptimal

positioning of the fiducials the measurements were

repeated with four different seed configurations (optimal,

typical clinical case, clinical case with three fiducials,

clinical case with two fiducially). Measurements were

conducted in coronal and sagittal planes. Finally, the films

were scanned (Perfection V700, Epson, USA) 72 hours after

the irradiation and the measured and calculated dose

distributions were compared using gamma-analysis

(5%/2mm threshold).

Figure 1.

A) Custom made phantom used to measure

prostate SBRT treatment plans. B) The directions of the

prostate movements and rotations. C) Typical clinical and

maximum intra-fraction prostate movements used in the

present study

Results

The accuracy of the automatic correction of intra-fraction

motion of the target was clinically acceptable when three

or four seed configuration was used in the motion tracking

(Table 1). No significant changes in gamma pass rates were

detected when the amount of phantom movement was

increased. Clinically unacceptable gamma pass rates were

detected only when two fiducials where used in tracking.

Table 1.

Gamma pass rates of measured and calculated

treatment plan comparisons for different fiducial

configurations and phantom movements.

Conclusion

Automatic correction of the target movement was

reasonably accurate for clinical use when three or four