Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  599 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 599 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S583

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Purpose or Objective

A standardized way of converting PET signals into target

volume is not yet available. The aim of this study was to

evaluate a [18F] FDG-PET adaptive thresholding algorithm

for the delineation of the biological tumour volume for the

radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning of head and neck

cancer patients.

Material and Methods

Thirty-eight patients, who underwent exclusive intensity

modulated RT with simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT-

SIB) for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (3 oral

cavity, 9 nasopharynx, 19 oropharynx, 6 hypopharynx, and

1 larynx cancer) were included in the present study.

Thirty-five/38 patients presented a locally advanced

disease (92.1%), and 30/38 patients (78.9%) received a

concomitant chemoradiotherapy. For all patients, [18F]

FDG-PET/CT was performed in treatment position with the

customized thermoplastic mask. Two radiation oncologists

defined the primary biologic tumour volumes (BTV) using

the adaptive thresholding algorithm implemented on the

iTaRT workstation (Tecnologie Avanzate, Italy). The

algorithm used specific calibration curves that depended

on the lesion-to-background ratio (LB ratio) and on the

amplitude of reconstruction smoothing filter (FWH).

The evaluation of reproducibility of adaptive thresholding

algorithm for volume estimation was determined by the

volume overlap of multiple segmentation of the same

lesion by two radiation oncologists. Each primary tumour

volume was segmented by the adaptive thresholding

algorithm (BTV

ATA

). The target volumes for the primary

tumours previously delineated on the planning computed

tomography (CT) scan using anatomic imaging (CT and

MRI) (gross tumour volume standard GTV

ST

) and a fixed

image intensity threshold method (40% of maximum

intensity) of [18F] FDG-PET standardized uptake value

(GTV

40%SUV)

were used to perform a volumetric comparison.

Results

The algorithm generated a tumour volume in all but two

patients. The mean values with standard deviation (SD) of

volumes based on the three different methods were

reported in Table 1.

The BTV

ATA

was significantly smaller than the GTV

ST

(17 vs.

21 cc, p= 0.04); the conformity index (CI) was 0.46, and

the similarity coefficient (DICE) was 0.7 (Sensibility 66%,

specificity 85%). BTV

ATA

is a part of the GTV

ST

.

The BTV

ATA

was bigger than the GTV

40%SUV

(17 vs. 15 cc) but

the difference was not statistically different (p> 0.05), the

CI was 0.8 and the DICE was 0.2.

Table 1. Tumour Volumes defined by the three different

methods.

GTV

Mean Volume

(cc)

Ranges

Standard

Deviation

GTV

ST

21.4

4.5 –

66.3

±16.0

GTV

40%SUV

14.7

1.3 – 58.5 ±13.7

GTV T

ATA

17.2

1.5 – 61.5 ± 12.8

Conclusion

The proposed adaptive thresholding algorithm resulted

robust and reproducible in the clinical context of head and

neck tumours. The tumour volumes obtained by the

algorithm were a part of the GTV

ST

and were similar to

GTV

40%SUV.

This tumour volume could allow the delineation

of a BTV for dose escalation in head and neck cancer

treated with

IMRT-SIB.

EP-1060 Analysis of failure patterns and prognostic

factors after postoperative IMRT for buccal cancer

Y.W. Lin

1

, L.C. Lin

1

1

Chi Mei Medical Center, Department of Radiation

Oncology, Tainan, Taiwan

Purpose or Objective

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of buccal mucosa has a

high incidence of locoregional failure. Its aggressive

behavior and the change of lymphatic and vascular

drainage after surgery make the design of radiotherapy

difficult. The aim of this study is to analyze failure

patterns and prognostic factors in patients with locally

advanced buccal cancer after postoperative intensity

modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Material and Methods

Between January 2007 to October 2012, 84 patients with

histological confirmed SCC of buccal mucosa underwent

surgery followed by postoperative IMRT were

retrospectively analyzed.. All patients were stage III/IV

buccal cancer. The high-risk clinical target volume (CTV)

covered the surgical tumor bed and ipsilateral or bilateral

upper neck. The median dose to high-risk CTV was 60Gy.

Analyzed end-points were overall survival (OS), local

recurrence-free survival, loco-regional recurrence-free

survival, supra-mandibular notch recurrence-free survival,

distant metastasis-free survival, prognostic factors and

patterns of failure.

Results

The median follow up was 51 months (range, 2-112

months). The first recurrent sites were local tumor bed

(17 patients) with or without regional/distant recurrence.

The median time from treatment completion to first

locoregional recurrence was 7.3 months. Of the 17

patients with local recurrence, 11 exhibited the supra-

mandibular notch recurrence; most were classified as

marginal failure. The estimated 4-year local failure-free,

locoregional failure-free, distant metastasis-free and

overall survival rates were 72%, 63.3%, 85.9% and 68.8%.

In multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion (P =

0.002), N2 disease (P = 0.003), and ratio of tumor

thickness to tumor size larger than 1/3 (P = 0.014) were

independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

Patients received tumor excision with maxillectomy was a

predictive factor for the development of supra-mandibular

notch recurrence.

Conclusion

SCC of buccal mucosa is a highly aggressive form of oral

cavity cancer with a high locoregional failure rate and

most locoregional recurrences led to lethal events. Design

of postoperative IMRT for buccal cancer, especially CTV

delineation, based on failure patterns and

clinicopathological prognostic factors might transfer into

better disease control.

EP-1061 Towards a validated Decision Aid Tool for

advanced larynx cancer patients

A.J. Berlanga

1

, M. Petersen

2

, F. Hoebers

1

, S.

Delbressine

1

, M. Van den Breke

2,3,4

, P. Lambin

1

1

Maastro Clinic, GROW School for Oncology and

Developmental Biology- Maastricht University Medical

Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

2

The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Head

and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Amsterdam, The

Netherlands

3

Academic Medical Center, Department of Oral and

Maxillofacial Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

4

University of Amsterdam, Institute of Phonetic Sciences,

Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Purpose or Objective

Advanced larynx cancer patients may be eligible for more

than one treatment: laryngectomy, radiotherapy,

chemoradiation, or combinations thereof. These

treatments have a distinct impact on quality of life (e.g.

disfigurement, speech, swallowing problems), and

outcomes depending on TNM-classification.

To empower these patients to participate in shared-

decision making, we are creating a web-based Patient