Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  613 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 613 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S597

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

chronic toxicities, disease status and overall survival at 2

years were compared between conventional 2DRT and

IMRT. Treatment related toxicities were reported using

physician rated RTOG acute and late toxicity criteria.

Results

58 patients who were treated with conventional 2DRT and

56 patients who were treated with IMRT for locally

advanced HNSCC between 2012 and 2014 were chosen for

comparative analysis. The 2DRT arm consisted of 45% of

stage III and 55% of stage IV patients whereas the IMRT arm

had 27% and 73% of them respectively. In the 2DRT arm

53% and 47% had grade 2 and 3 acute mucositis where as

in the IMRT arm it was 80% and 5% respectively. This

difference reached statistical significance (p<0.001). But,

acute skin toxicity was only marginally higher in the 2DRT

arm than the IMRT arm.

In the 2DRT arm 84% had grade 2 and 3 acute xerostomia

while in the IMRT arm it was 45% and this difference

reached statistical significance (p=0.004). Likewise, the

difference remained statistically significant (p=0.01) with

chronic xerostomia evaluated at 1 year post treatment

with an incidence of 76% in the 2DRT arm and 38% in the

IMRT arm.

It was observed that the treatment break due to acute

radiation reactions were more in the 2DRT arm (16%) than

in the IMRT arm (9%), however this did not reach statistical

significance. However, these two modalities showed no

significant differences in response to CRT and loco-

regional control or survival at 2 years.

Conclusion

IMRT significantly reduces the incidence and severity of

acute mucositis and acute and chronic xerostomia when

compared with conventional 2DRT in the treatment of

locally advanced HNSCC. However, IMRT did not show

superiority over 2DRT with respect to response to CRT,

locoregional control and survival at 2 years.

EP-1086 Health status and phisical activity in head and

neck cancer survivors

A. Matías-Pérez

1

, G. Gallego-Herreros

1

, B. G. Díaz de

Tudanca

1

, P. Soria-Carreras

1

, A. Nieto-Palacios

1

, A.

Rodríguez-Gutierrez

1

, L.A. Pérez-Romasanta

1

1

Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Radiation

Oncology Department, Salamanca, Spain

Purpose or Objective

Head and Neck (H&N) cancer survivors are an increasingly

population, due to the improvement in diagnosis and

treatment. The aim of this study is to analyse the health

status and physical activity in H&N cancer survivors in a

single institution.

Material and Methods

The population was composed of a series of 50 H&N cancer

patients survivors (>3 years post-diagnosis) treated in our

institution from 2006 to 2013, having no signs of cancer

recurrence to the date. They were reviewed based on

personal interviews and specific questionnaires. The

health status items measured were: nutritional

assessment (with the Body Mass Index (BMI), the

Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the

Subjective Global Assessment (SGA)), cardiovascular risk

(with the HeartScore® tool), toxic habits (tobacco and

alcohol by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test

(AUDIT)) and physical activity (with the Global Physical

Activity Questionnaire(GPAQ)).

Results

The mean age was 64 years (range, 43-84 years) and 46

patients (92%) were male. The most frequent site of the

primary tumour was larynx (48%) and the main histology

squamous cell carcinoma (76%). 72% of patients had

advanced cancers (stages III and IV), whereas 26% had

stages I and II. All patients received radiotherapy, of which

31 patients (62%) were given 3DRT technique and 19

patients (38%) IMRT technique. Surgery was performed in

17 patients (34%), and 20 patients (40%) underwent neck

dissection. The most part of our population had

overweight (BMI 27 ± 3). The MUST score showed that 7

patients (14%) were at high risk of malnutrition, and

regarding SGA, 12 patients (24%) were suspected of

malnutrition. Cardiovascular risk was high or very high in

12 (24%) and 19 (19%) patients, respectively. Taking into

account toxic habits, 6 patients (12%) were active

smokers, while 38 (76%) were ex-smokers. AUDIT score

showed that 3 (6%) were risk drinkers and 3 (6%) had

problems related with alcohol abused. 86% of the patients

accomplished WHO recommendations of physical exercise.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that head and neck cancer survivors

could have clinical issues regarding health status, and

efforts should be done to identify these patients,

especially those with risk of malnutrition, high

cardiovascular risk or toxic habits, in order to offer the

best clinical care.

EP-1087 Real-world Cetuximab toxicity in curative

and recurrent/metastatic setting in HNSCC patients.

I. Desideri

1

, C. Muntoni

1

, C. Ciabatti

1

, M. Lo Russo

1

, P.

Bonomo

1

, M. Loi

1

, D. Greto

1

, I. Meattini

1

, L. Livi

1

1

University of Florence, Radiotherapy, Firenze, Italy

Purpose or Objective

Observational monocentric study to assess, in patients

affected by head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

(HNSCC), the acute toxicity of Cetuximab (CTX)

administered concurrently with radiotherapy (RT) in the

curative setting, or as a chemotherapy (CT) in patients

with recurrent/metastatic disease.