Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  659 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 659 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S643

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

RAD AB, Sweden) and compared to a reference scan taken

at the beginning of each session. The Catalyst

TM

system

works through an optical surface scanning with LED light

(blue: λ = 450 nm) and reprojection captured by a CCD

camera (green: λ = 528 nm; red: λ = 624 nm), which

provide target position control during treatment delivery.

For 3D surface reconstruction, the system uses a non-rigid

body algorithm to calculate the distance between the

surface and the isocenter and using the principle of optical

triangulation. Three-dimensional deviations and relative

position differences during the whole treatment fraction

were calculated by the system and analyzed statistically.

Results

Overall, the magnitude of the deviation vector showed a

mean change of 1.3 mm +/- 0.4 mm (standard deviation)

and a median change of 1.1 mm during dose application

(beam-on time only). Along the lateral and longitudinal

axis changes were quite similar (0.9 mm +/- 0.3 mm vs.

0.9 mm +/- 0.5 mm), on the vertical axis the mean change

was 1.1 mm +/- 0.3 mm. The mean net beam-on time of

radiation therapy was 2.8 minutes. There was no linear

correlation between the length of the fraction and the

magnitude of deviation. Pearson’s correlation coefficient

between mean time and mean magnitude of deviation

vector over all patients was 0.25 (p-value= 0.175).

Conclusion

Mean real-time intrafraction motion was within two

millimeters in all directions and is therefore of minor

clinical relevance in postoperative radiotherapy of breast

cancer.

EP-1187 Heart dose evaluation in two free-breathing

and deep-breathing modes of breast cancer patients

R. Anbiae

1

, A.R. Taji

1

, A. Ahmari

1

, Z. Siavashpour

2

, M.

Beigi

1

1

Shahid Beheshti Medical University, Radiation Oncology,

Tehran, Iran Islamic Republic of

2

Shahid Beheshti University, Medical Radiation

Engineering, Tehran, Iran Islamic Republic of

Purpose or Objective

To investigate how much respiratory manner of breast

cancer patients during external beam radiotherapy would

affect their heart dose.

Material and Methods

21 patients with left breast cancer underwent CT

simulation without contrast in one day and two positions;

breath hold and free breathing, prospectively. Two CT

image sets were imported to treatment planning system

(Eclipse, version 6). Volumes of PTV (that included breast

and chest wall), heart and ipsilateral lung in both image

sets were contoured by an individual radiation oncologist.

An experienced physicist designed the plans for both CTs.

Prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions for all included

cases. Plans were then confirmed by the oncologist and

heart and lung dose volume parameters were

exported. Lung and heart Volumes, their V30 and V22.5

and also mean heart dose (MHD) in two condition were

studied and analyzed.

Results

Mean age of patients was 46.9±12.1.Twelve patients had

done MRM and 9 of them had done BCS. Mean heart

volume, its V30, V22.5 and MHD in two breathing

conditions, breath hold and free breathing, were 519±108

and 526±107 (P=0.545), 1.89±2.41 and 62.88±2.04

(P=0.030) , 2.41±2.68 and 4.35±3.42 (P=0.048) and

0.98±0.7 and 1.42±0.5 (P=0.002), respectively. Also left

lung volume and V30 of lung in breath hold and free

breathing modes were 1763±315 and 1114±219 (P<0.001)

and 8.72±3.27 and 8.92±4.29 (P=0.819) respectively.

Person correlation did not show linear relation between

lung volume and its mentioned DVH parameters; for MHD

obtained r=-0.421 (P=0.057), for heart V30 and V22.5

obtained r=-0.500 (P=0.021) and obtained r=-0.371

(P=0.097) and also, for heart volume r=0.032 (P=0.889).

Conclusion

All MHD and heart V30 and V22.5 variables were

significantly higher with deep breathing in our study. It

was shown that irritated heart volume was reduced

significantly in this condition. V30 of lung were lower in

deep breathing so deep breathing can be efficient method

in

left

breath teletherapy.

EP-1188 DIBH radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer

patients using an optical surface scanning system

S. Schönecker

1

, M. Pazos

1

, P. Freislederer

1

, D. Reitz

1

, H.

Scheithauer

1

, S. Corradini

1

, C. Belka

1

1

LMU University of Munich, Radiation Oncology, Munich,

Germany

Purpose or Objective

There is a potential for adverse cardiovascular effects in

long-term breast cancer survivors following adjuvant

radiotherapy (RT). For this purpose, the deep inspiration

breath-hold technique (DIBH) has been introduced into

clinical practice, to maximally reduce the radiation dose

to the heart. In the present study radiotherapy in DIBH was

applied using the optical surface scanning system

Catalyst

TM

/Sentinel

TM

.

Material and Methods

A total of 38 patients with left-sided breast cancer

following breast conserving surgery were analysed.

Normofractionated and hypofractionated radiotherapy

protocols were eligible for this prospective clinical trial.

Patient surface data and respiratory parameters were

acquired using the laser surface scanner Sentinel

TM

(C-RAD

AB, Uppsala, Sweden) during CT acquisition in free

breathing (FB) and DIBH. Dual treatment plans were

created and dosimetric output parameters of organs at

risk were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For

treatment application the optical surface scanner

Catalyst

TM

(C-RAD AB, Uppsala, Sweden) was used and

gating control was performed with an individual audio and

video glasses-based feedback system. The Catalyst

TM

is

interconnected to the LINAC systems via a gating interface

and allows for a continuous and touchless surface

scanning.

Results

Following initial patient training and treatment setup,

radiotherapy in DIBH with the Catalyst

TM

/Sentinel

TM

system

was time-efficient and reliable. 30 of 38 patients were

treated using normofractionated treatment protocols. In

these patients, the reduction of the mean heart dose for

DIBH compared to FB was 43.2 % (2.45 to 1.39 Gy; p <

0.001). The maximum doses to the heart and LAD were

reduced by 47.2 % (41.3 to 21.8 Gy; p < 0.001) and 61.7 %

(31.2 to 11.9 Gy; p < 0.001), respectively. For 8

hypofractionated regimes the reduction of the mean heart

dose for DIBH compared to FB was 50.1 % (2.13 to 1.06 Gy;

p = 0.012). The maximum doses to the heart and LAD were

reduced by 49.7 % (38.8 to 19.5 Gy; p = 0.012) and 77.3%

(29.9 to 6.8 Gy; p = 0.012), respectively. Overall, also the

mean lung dose and the V20 of the ipsilateral lung were

significantly lower (-16.1 % and -17.8 %) for DIBH (Lung

Mean

6.64 Gy; Lung V

20

= 11.7 %) compared to FB (Lung

Mean

7.92

Gy; Lung V

20

= 14.2 %; p each <0.001).

Conclusion

The Catalyst

TM

/Sentinel

TM

system enabled a fast and

reliable application and surveillance of DIBH in daily

clinical routine. Furthermore, the present data confirm

that using the DIBH technique during RT could significantly

reduce high dose areas and mean doses to the heart.