Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  692 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 692 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S676

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

EP-1256 Local ablative radiotherapy for liver

metastasis: factors affecting local control and survival

C. Petersen

1

, T. Gauer

1

, T. Frenzel

1

, M. Todorovic

1

, A.

Krüll

1

, M. Blaschczyk

1

1

University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf UKE,

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hamburg, Germany

Purpose or Objective

The liver is a common site of metastases from most

common solid malignancies. Currently available systemic

treatment regimens, result in transient to long-term

disease control, raising the question of further local

management. Secondary resection and thermo-ablation

may contribute to long-term survival or allow at least a

relevant chemotherapy-free interval. These approaches

are often limited. With stereotactic body radiotherapy

metastases can be treated with high efficiency in only a

few sessions. Here we evaluate the feasibility of high-dose

stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases in

patients not eligible for surgery focussing on colorectal

cancer patients.

Material and Methods

Between July 2012 and December 2015, 33 patients with

56 liver metastases (range 1-4) were treated with SBRT.

Primary tumor mostly consists of colorectal cancer (59%)

and others (lung-, breast-, pancreatic cancer). Median

time between diagnosis of liver metastases and SBRT was

11 months (range 0-57 months). To receive precise

information about target localization, 3 gold fiducial

markers were implanted in 30 out of 56 lesions (54%). To

analyze respiratory tumor motion, 4D-CT scans were

performed for all patients. Gross tumor volume contours

of 10 breathing cycles were transferred to the average CT

of the CD-CT data, forming the internal target volume

(ITV). Planning target volume was obtained by adding a 4

mm margin. SBRT was delivered in VMAT technique using

Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator. Most common

fractionation schedule was 5 x 11 Gy (90% isodose covering

the PTV).

Results

The median follow-up for all patients was 13 months. The

overall local control rate for all 56 metastases was 86%

with a total of 7 failures. In univariate analysis, the

implantation of fiducial markers was predictive for local

control (p=0.029). During follow up period, tumor

progression developed in 28 cases (83%). In 13 cases new

intrahepatic lesions occurred (47%), in 10 cases extra

hepatic lesions (36%) and in 5 cases intra- and extra

hepatic lesions (18%). Overall survival rate was 58%,

median overall survival was 21 months. Univariate analysis

showed statistical significance for OS concerning histology

(colorectal vs. other) and gross tumor volume (</> 20

ccm).

Conclusion

Liver SBRT is effective and yielded good local control. The

SBRT procedure is a valid option for patients with

oligometastatic disease and should be considered as an

alternative to surgical treatment or other local ablative

techniques.

Electronic Poster: Clinical track: Lower GI (colon,

rectum, anus)

EP-1257 A look at pre-operative MRI accuracy at

predicting rectal cancer staging post

chemoradiotherapy

K. Nugent

1

, R. McDermott

1

, M. Higgins

1

, B. O'Neill

1

1

St Lukes Radiation Network, Radiation Oncology,

Dublin, Ireland

Purpose or Objective

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherpy (CRT) has become

standard in the treatment of rectal cancer patients with

stage 3 disease. This approach has shown to reduce both

local recurrence rates and increase the rate of sphincter

preservation procedures. Up to 20% of patients 6 weeks

post neoadjuvant CRT have a complete histological

response (pCR). PCR has shown to correlate with better

and sustained oncological outcomes. The feasibility of the

emerging watch and wait management strategy for

patients with pCR will depend on the reliability of

restaging

assessments

post

CRT.

We looked the accuracy of pre-operative MRI in predicting

the rectal cancer tumour stage, node status and complete

clinical response in patients who have undergone

neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using histopathologic

analysis as the reference standard.

Material and Methods

We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent

neoadjuvant CRT (50.4 Gy, 1.8 Gy/fraction, in 5.5 weeks,

with continuous infusional fluorouracil 225 mg/m2daily)

for rectal cancer and proceeded to standard TME at our

institution over a 16 month period. Their initial cTNM

staging was collected as was their restaging ycTNM post

CRT (based on diffusion weighted MRI pelvis). The

sensitivity and specificity of the latter at predicting

tumour, nodal and complete clinical response compared

to surgical histology was analysed.

Results

43 patients underwent CRT and subsequent TME over the

time period at our institution. Overall histopathological

response rate was 93% with a pCR rate of 14%. MRI had a

sensitivity of 58% and specificity of 94% at assessing

compete clinical response, 95 CI 40-93%, 80-99%

respectively. At predicting tumour response MRI had

sensitivity of 53% and specificity of 85%, 95 CI 45-80%, 74-

94% respectively. Accuracy of predicting nodal response

were lower with a sensitivity of 43% and specificity of 40%

, 95 CI 30-88%,32-58% respectively. The average modal

time interval between CRT and MRI was 5 weeks while the

average modal time between CRT and surgery was 8 weeks

Conclusion

Our study suggests that MRI alone may not be accurate

enough in assessing clinical stage post neoadjuvant CRT,

and particularly the clinical node status. Imaging alone

will likely be needed to be combined with clinical,

biochemical and endoscopic assessments in order to

improve reliability of post treatment rectal staging.

EP-1258 High precision SIB-IMRT versus conventional

radiotherapy in anal cancer: a propensity score

analysis

F. Arcadipane

1

, A. Lepinoy

2

, P. Franco

1

, M. Ceccarelli

3

, B.

De Bari

2

, L. Lestrade

2

, G. Furfaro

1

, M. Mistrangelo

4

, G.

Créhange

5

, U. Ricardi

1

1

Radiation Oncology, Oncology, Turin, Italy

2

Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Besançon,

France

3

Cancer Epidemiology and CPO Piemonte, Epidemiology,

Turin, Italy

4

Surgery, Surgical Sciences, Turin, Italy

5

Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Dijon, France

Purpose or Objective

To evaluate clinical outcomes of a simultaneous

integrated boost- intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-

IMRT) approach in patients with non-metastatic anal

cancer compared to those of a set of patients treated with

3-dimensional conformal radiation and sequential boost

(CRT).

Material and Methods

A retrospective cohort of 190 anal cancer patients

consecutively treated between March 2007 and October