Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  704 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 704 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S688

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Material and Methods

Between April 2013 and July 2016, 87 patients with anal

carcinoma were treated with IMRT in the Oxford University

Hospital NHS Trust. We retrospectively reviewed clinical

notes for patients and tumour demographics, rates of

recurrence and colostomy status. Data was collected and

analysed using Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Office

Professional Plus 2013 and IBM SPSS Software Version 23.

Results

The median range of the patient population in this study

was 61 (range 37-90), with 29:71 male:female ratio. Rates

of Tx/T1/T2 and T3/T4 were 62.1% and 37.9%

respectively, node negative (N0) and node positive (N+)

were 48.8% and 51.2% respectively. 96.6% of patients were

free of metastatic disease prior to radiotherapy. The

median follow up time after radiotherapy was 15 months

(range 3 to 38 months).

The 2 year disease free and overall survival was 76.5% and

83.9% respectively. 94% of patients had a 3 month

complete response rate, with 5 patients having an

incomplete response, 4 of whom underwent salvage

surgery.

At the time of analysis, 5 patients had isolated local

relapse following CR at 3 months. Of those, 3 went on to

salvage surgery. 7 patients (8%) had distant disease of

which 3 patients had both local and distant disease.

2 year colostomy free survival was 75.2%. 12 of the

patients had pre-treatment stoma with 7 more patients

requiring a colostomy after radiotherapy.

Conclusion

The outcomes in our series suggest that the excellent

outcomes achieved with 3D conformal radiotherapy in

ACT2 are reproducible with IMRT, delivered according to

UK guidance. A larger multicentre audit of outcomes is

planned to confirm our findings.

EP-1281 Feasibility and Toxicity analysis of dose-

escalation by SIB/VMAT schedule in rectal cancer

patients

A. Re

1

, G. Chiloiro

1

, M.A. Gambacorta

1

, F. Cellini

1

, A.

Pesce

1

, D. Marchesano

1

, G.C. Mattiucci

1

, S. Manfrida

1

, V.

Valentini

1

1

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Radiation

Oncology Department, Rome, Italy

Purpose or Objective

Evaluation of the feasibility of an intensification of

radiation

dose

by

simultaneous

integrated

boost/Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (SIB/VMAT)

technique in patients (pts) affected by Locally Advanced

Rectal Cancer (LARC) based on toxicity profile.

Material and Methods

Pts affected by non-metastatic LARC underwent

neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). The CRT was

delivered in 25 fractions with SIB-VMAT strategy on two

volumes: Clinical target volume (CTV)2 received a total

dose of 45 Gy/1.8 Gy/fraction on the total mesorectum

and the nodes of drainage; CTV1 received 55

Gy/2.2Gy/fraction as a moderate hypofractionated

schedule on the tumor and the corresponding

mesorectum.

Surgery was planned at least 8 weeks after the end of

CRT. A watch and wait (WW) strategy was considered if

restaging exams showed no detectable disease. Adjuvant

chemotherapy (CT) was considered according to risk

factors. Acute Gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU)

and hematological (HE) adverse events were recorded

according to CTCAE scale v4.0. Collaterally CRT efficacy

in terms of pathological Complete response (pCR) was

analyzed and Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) on the basis

of Mandard scale was recorded.

Results

Thirty-nine pts treated from May 2015 to February 2016

were included in this analysis. The median age was 64

years [range 44-77years]; Male-Female ratio was 2.2.

Clinical involvement of mesorectal fascia was detected in

18

pts

(46%).

CTV2 included always presacral space and internal iliac

nodes, in 30 pts (77%) and in 4 pts (10%) the obturator

nodes and the external iliac nodes were added,

respectively. 5 pts received CT in the pre-surgical

pause. 38 pts received a Total Mesorectal Excision surgery

(69% Anterior Resection and 26% Abdominal-Perineal

Resection), in 2 pts (5%) a WW approach was preferred.

Adjuvant CT was administered to 18 pts. The radiation

prescribed dose was entirely delivered in all pts. GI

toxicity was recorded in 31 pts (79%): diarrhea and

proctitis were most detected. Four cases of grade 3 GI

toxicities were registered (6% of all GI toxicities). GU and

HE toxicities were less frequent: non infective cystitis (13

pts) and neutropenia (6 pts) were observed. However,

none of them presented a toxicity grade≥ 3.

About CT, 8 pts (20%) received less than 4 cycles of

concomitant CT because of HE or GI toxicity. pCR was

achieved in 10 pts (26%). TRG grade 1 2 3 and 4 was

recorded in 11 (28%), 8 (20.5%), 13 (33%) and 5 (13%),

respectively. At the median follow-up of 18 weeks the

local control, the disease-free survival and the overall

survival rates were 100%, 92% and 97%, respectively.