Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  913 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 913 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S897

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

on the symmetry of the organ.

Conclusion

Rotational errors have to be corrected regardless of

translations magnitude.

Although rotations don’t impact

on CTV V95%, 6DoF corrections allow better PTV’s

coverage. Rotational errors could cause considerable

dosimetric changes in organs at risk and must be carefully

corrected in SBRT to avoid normal tissue complications.

An ongoing analysis on setup systems and margin

reductions has been planned.

EP-1652 A new position verification protocol for breast

cancer with integrated boost

K.L. Gottlieb

1

, E.L. Lorenzen

1

, J.D. Jensen

2

, M.H.

Nielsen

2

, M. Ewertz

2

1

Odense University Hospital, Laboratory of Radiation

Physics, Odense, Denmark

2

Odense University Hospital, Department of Oncology,

Odense, Denmark

Purpose or Objective

The use of integrated boost compared to sequential boost

allows shortening of the overall treatment time while

maintaining the same biologically equivalent dose to the

boost region. However when the target is large as in breast

cancer treatments there can be challenges in IGRT

registrations between the boost volume and total target

volume. The present study proposes and evaluates a

protocol for daily IGRT using CBCT of breast cancer

patients with integrated boost. A threshold is set for the

allowed difference between the whole target match and

the boost specific match. If the two matches differ by less

than the threshold the boost volume and the total volume

is treated in the same setup. If the two matches differ by

more than the threshold, the total target volume is

matched and treated and then secondly an additional

CBCT is performed and matched on the boost volume

which is then treated.

Material and Methods

In order to evaluate the match protocol all patients

receiving RT during the period 1/1-2016 and 1/7 2016

after breast conserving surgery and with lymph node

involvement were retrospectively included in the study.

The number of patients eligible for inclusion was 18 (3 was

rejected because of missing (2) or faint (1) clips). All

patients received daily IGRT with CBCT using XVI from

Elekta. CBCT’s for the first ten fractions were included

resulting in 180 CBCT. Two matches were performed for

each patient: First, a chest wall-match were performed,

where CBCT images were registered automatically to the

planning CT using a grey value translational match of the

thorax wall. Secondly, a boost specific match was

performed, where the surgical clips were manually

registered to their position on the planning CT.

Results

The systematic (Σ) and random errors (σ) between the

thorax wall and the clips based boost matches are seen in

the table. The CTV-PTV margins were calculated based on

the systematic and random errors using the Van Herk

margin recipe. These numbers are found both using no re-

matching and a re-matching if there were more than 5 mm

differences between the two matches. In the figure the

percentage of rematches needed for a given threshold of

allowed difference between the thorax wall and boost

match is shown in a). The boost CTV to PTV margin

required to account for the difference between chest wall

and boost match for a given threshold is shown in b). The

grey shaded area shows the 90 percent confidence interval

obtained by bootstrapping.

Conclusion

The presented protocol can reduce the required CTV to

PTV margin for the boost region by re-scanning and re-

matching the boost region only for patients where the two

regions differ by more than a set threshold. Results are

presented that can be used for selecting a threshold with

the corresponding required CTV-PTV margin. If e.g. a

threshold of 5 mm is used, the required CTV-PTV margin

can be reduced from approximately 8mm to 5mm and re-

scanning and re-matching will be required in only 5% of

the fractions.

EP-1653 PolymarkTM fiducial markers migration in

Prostate Image Guided Radiation Therapy using CBCT

images

C. Camacho

1

, I. Valduvieco

1

, J. Sáez

1

, A. Herreros

1

, J.

García-Miguel

1

, E. Agustí

1

, C. Castro

1

1

Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Radiotherapy, Barcelona,

Spain

Purpose or Objective

Polymer-based fiducial markers, FM (Polymark

TM

) location

was analyzed to test the idea that there is no intraseed

migration within the prostate, which is fundamental for

patient set-up good quality overthe entire course of

radiotherapy treatment (RT).