Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  538 / 1359 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 538 / 1359 Next Page
Page Background

Unresolved issues with electron pencil beam

models

Dublin 2018

16

PB methods assume Gaussian characteristics of the incident beam. Hence,

influence from “non Gaussian” features (collimator scattering, etc) yield profile

errors and make output factors hard to calculate (has to be table lookup driven).

Penumbra modeling through manipulation of incident pencil width may wash

out effects of heterogeneities.

Requires homogeneous energy and directional distribution over the field.

Beam modeling:

Heterogeneities are well modeled at the first part of the depth range (since

voxels are larger than the FE pencil width).

At the end of the electron range, effects of localized heterogeneities (smaller

than the FE pencil width using semi-infinite slab approximation) get washed

out PB by models. “Redefinition” and “phase space evolution” models fix that,

to the cost of CPU&memory…

Heterogeneities: