October - November 2015
MODERN QUARRYING
23
from strength to strength and the calibre
of speakers has improved considerably as
have the venues. Pienaar has asked that
members visit the Aspasa website for
the regional meeting dates, and try and
attend. “It’s a great networking exercise
and we update our members on the lat-
est legislation and challenges we’re expe-
riencing in the industry.”
Better fall protection
New fall protection regulations have
placed a large onus on designers and
builders of structures and equipment to
include a high level of in-built protection
to prevent fall-related accidents.
Pienaar says the regulations call for
attention to the provision of safer access
to heights on structures and machines.
“This is a welcome addition to eliminat-
ing injuries in the workplace and will
be particularly beneficial in the quarry
industry.”
The regulation makes it the duty of
designers to ensure that applicable stan-
dards are complied with in the design and
construction of equipment and buildings
to provide safer access to the workplace
and prescribes that a risk-based approach
be adopted to overcome hazards.
“By paying closer attention to guard-
rails, stairs, ladders and other access
points, we believe the regulation will
close any loopholes that may previously
have existed that allowed unsafe access
to be built into machines and structures.
Now it requires that much thought be
given to access to work areas at height.
“Instead of rung ladders, for exam-
ple, designers may be able to integrate a
stairway or provide additional handrails
to make access safer. In this way it effec-
tively reduces future risks and completely
removes the potential for falls in future.
“This is in line with developments
around the world where questions are
being asked about existing safety stan-
dards and how to improve upon them
to take the workplace to the next level of
safety. In terms of fall protection, a lot is
being done around the world to improve
codes and standards dealing with require-
ments to prevent falling from heights,” he
says.
In addition to the new standard, com-
panies are also being advised to look
towards countries with similar quarrying
techniques for additional HSE input.
Countries like Australia have pushed hard
for practical standards that can help pre-
vent injuries. Its standards, for example,
provide valuable input on guardrails,
stairs and stepladders.
By applying similar standards and
best practices, designers are in a position
to build access platforms at height to
the correct specifications using suitable
materials that will dramatically reduce
injuries in future. These international
standards provide technical informa-
tion and common sense applications
that can be used in additional to local
requirements.
“We therefore urge our members and
all those involved in the quarrying indus-
try to become familiar with requirements
of regulations and to look at related
global standards to ensure that future
construction work and procurement of
equipment is in line with requirements.
Not only will it prevent future legal prob-
lems, but it will assist our quarries to pre-
vent accidents and fatalities in future,”
Pienaar urges.
Negating risks
Responsible people within sand and
aggregate quarries in South Africa should
look beyond health and safety compli-
ance requirements, to implementing
custom requirements that are able to
reduce hazards within their own specific
operations.
“By simply using common sense and
adopting a stepped approach to iden-
tification of risks, health and safety (HS)
officers can play a large role in preventing
accidents and making our quarries safer,”
he says.
For this reason HS officers should be
given scope to evaluate and re-evaluate
each process in a quarry and observe work
in progress to try to identify potential
problem areas. Also to gauge the workers’
uptake of guidelines and whether they
are using the correct PPE at all times.
“Aspasa has in place one of the most
advanced health and safety systems in
the southern African industry and all
members are required to comply with
the systems and standards. In order to
ensure compliance, companies are also
subjected to annual audits that are con-
ducted by an independent auditor to
FACE TO FACE WITH
ASPASA
ensure legal compliance.
“Yet despite this, we still urge our
members to take an additional long, hard
look at their operations and evaluate each
step of their processes with health and
safety in mind. If, for example, the respon-
sible person observes that a walkway may
be slippery when wet and poses a risk of
falling, then it needs to be evaluated and
if necessary steps need to be taken to pre-
vent an accident.
“Evaluation should follow a stepped
approach based on risk management
principals, ie identification of risk, assess
the actual risk, put steps in place to con-
trol to eliminate the risk and then eval-
uate the effectiveness of the measures,”
Pienaar says.
He explains that the above scenario
may be handled as follows:
1. The risk of a slippery floor is identified
and may cause a person to fall to the
floor or over the guardrail.
2. This is assessed as a serious risk as
injuries may occur and control mea-
sures therefore need to be taken.
3. As a result non-slip strips are applied
to the floor and are tested in simu-
lated wet conditions.
4. If deemed to be a suitable remedy, no
further action may need to be taken;
however, it will need to be re-evalu-
ated in real wet conditions.
Similarly, the responsible HS officer needs
to look at PPE and assess whether addi-
tional protection is required in certain
areas. For example where overhead con-
veyors may pose a risk of falling objects, a
hardhat will be a requirement by law, but
additional eye protection may be wise as
debris from the conveyor may enter a per-
son’s eye and cause short-term injury or
long-term eye problems.
“Therefore in that particular applica-
tion eyewear may become a requirement
for the company even although it is not
required by law. The same applies for
hearing protection, fall arrest equipment,
footwear, etc,” he says.
“Often we need to stand back and
take an impartial look at our operations.
If we have not had an incident in a certain
part of a plant, it may not be that it is safe;
it may simply be that we are lucky and
the area is an accident waiting to happen.
We therefore implore our members and
all involved in the quarrying industry to