Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  11 / 772 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 772 Next Page
Page Background

9

Morningstar FundInvestor

January 2

015

Thus, you get some real individual stock risk tempered

by the emphasis on steady businesses. Compared

with most mid-growth funds, this one has a drastic

underweighting in health care and tech. And because

FPA

funds without “Crescent” in the name continue to

labor in obscurity, there’s little chance this fund will

suffer from asset bloat anytime soon.

Akre Focus

AKREX

is another atypical growth

fund worth investigating. Chuck Akre runs a focused

steady-growth portfolio that rarely ventures into

health care and technology. Akre buys “compounding

machines” with high cash flow, strong management,

and the ability to reinvest cash at a high rate of return.

Instead of the

Apples

AAPL

and

Teslas

TSLA

common to growth funds, you see

MasterCard

MC

,

American Tower

AMT

, and

Danaher

DHR

. Akre

has built a great record here and previously at

FBR

Focus (now

Hennessy Focus

HFCSX

).

Small Growth

Conestoga Small Cap

CCASX

really fits the unloved

mold. The fund, which has a Morningstar Analyst

Rating of Silver, had a great record until its pratfall in

2014

when several of its top tech stocks got whacked.

The long-term returns here remain solid, though,

and it seems appropriate to have one truly unloved

fund with rebound potential.

T. Rowe Price Diversified Small Cap Growth

PRDSX

shows that quantitative funds can still

deliver. Since

2008

, many quant funds have had

their circuits blow, but this fund has been a real

steady performer. Manager Sudhir Nanda runs a

low-turnover diffuse portfolio that has produced

strong results. Quant models crunch numbers on

valuations, earnings quality, and financial health

to produce a portfolio of more than

200

names.

Meridian Growth

has tremendous promise,

although it isn’t the easiest to buy into. The Legacy

share class,

MERDX

, is widely held but closed,

so new investors have to go through the Investor

shares,

MRIGX

, which have a

$99

,

999

minimum

investment. Sorry if that is a deal-breaker, but I think

it’s compelling if you can get in. Chad Meade and

Brian Schaub are focused growth investors who built

a brilliant record at

Janus Triton

JATTX

. The

duo looks for fast-growing companies with strong

competitive advantages. The fund holds a mix

of aggressive tech names like

Cadence Design

Systems

CDNS

alongside cheaper steadier stocks

like property manager

Jones Lang LaSalle

JLL

.

Avoid the Loved

So, what are the most-loved categories? Foreign

large blend drew the highest flows in

2014

, followed

by large blend and emerging markets. The strategy

suggests dialing down exposure to these categories.

However, I’m not sure I’d go too far with that. Those

first two are core categories that you should

always own. If you read the cover story, you know

I think emerging markets are relatively attractive.

So, I’m sharing the information for those who want to

follow the strategy to the letter—but I wouldn’t do it.

Historically, flows have followed performance, and

that’s why the strategy has been a winner. It leads

you to relatively cheap asset classes and away from

pricey ones. But since

2008

, performance and flows

have decoupled on the asset-class level even though

they continue to be linked on a fund level.

Now flows are more linked to headlines. Some

people have taken a pessimistic (albeit incorrect)

view of America’s economy and looked to China

as a superior bet. It hasn’t worked that way the past

five years, and it leaves us in the odd position of

seeing the nature of fund flows change.

The Bond Side

The bond side of flows might actually be providing

better signals. The overhyped and unimpressive

non-traditional-bond category has been the top draw,

while investors have turned bearish on bank-loan

funds and high-yield bond funds.

I like that trade. I’d much rather own bank loans and

high yield than nontraditional bond. However, bank

loans and high yield do face liquidity risks as outflows

could be a challenge to manage. Still, I see some

reward potential to go with those risks.

œ