![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0116.png)
18
In the short run, asset class and sector weightings
generally tell the tale for allocation funds. That’s
certainly been the case for the past three years. But
over the longer term, it’s about manager skill,
strategy, and expenses. You need a long-term view
to separate the wheat from the chaff.
Our moderate-allocation funds with Morningstar
Ratings of Gold have outperformed over the past
three years with one exception, and even that one
exception has strong five- and
10
-year records.
Over the past three years, an allocation fund’s stake
in U.S. equities has been crucial, as they have
trounced bonds and foreign stocks. (Moderate-allo-
cation funds are classified as funds that have
at least
10%
in bonds and between
50%
and
70%
in equities over a three-year average.)
It’s no surprise, then, that
Dodge & Cox Balanced
DODBX
has top-percentile three-year returns, as it
has
60%
of assets in U.S. stocks (compared with
47%
for its typical peer) and another
6%
in foreign equi-
ties. Its overall equity stake exceeded
70%
at times
during that three-year period. But to get a top
3%
15
-year return, you have to have great issue selection
and low costs.
Likewise, it is not a surprise that
Manning &
Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term
MNBAX
was
our one laggard. The fund’s U.S. equity weighting
of
46%
(it averaged
44%
over the period) was lower
than the group norm. But it was made worse by
some wayward sector calls as it favored natural
resources and other cyclical sectors at a time when
health care and technology were better places.
I’ll cut it some slack because no one gets those calls
right all the time. However, macroeconomic calls
are supposed to be a strength for the firm, so it gets
some demerits nonetheless. Its
15
-year record,
though, is in the top
11%
, so we don’t want to read
too much into a bad stretch.
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation
PRWCX
joined Dodge
&
Cox Balanced at the top of the peer
group rankings for three years despite a modest
56%
in U.S. equities. A chunk of foreign equities (
7%
)
helped as foreign stocks had higher returns than
bonds. In addition, the fund has some of its bond port-
folio in lower-quality debt, which has been a star
performer the past three years.
Vanguard Wellington
VWELX
has
56%
of assets
in equities and solid top-quartile returns across the
board. Ed Bousa’s preference for health care and wari-
ness of basic materials kept the fund chugging along
nicely. This fund, along with Dodge
&
Cox Balanc-
ed, has a decided value tilt. The fund is open to those
investing directly through Vanguard, but you can’t
get it through outside fund supermarkets anymore.
Vanguard Balanced Index
VBIAX
has
58%
in U.S.
equities. However, the equity exposure is via the
S
&
P
500
, and that gives it a bias toward the largest
companies, which has been a winning play the
past three years. Of course, the long-term appeal
here is super-low costs of just
0
.
09%
.
FPA Crescent
’s
FPACX
three- and five-year returns
are top
30%
for the category, and that’s really
quite good given its approach. The fund’s
40%
U.S.
equity weighting is one of the lowest in the group,
and its massive
44%
cash stake certainly slows
returns in a rally. Manager Steven Romick did have
more in stocks in early
2013
but has gradually dialed
that down as the stock market has rallied. Romick’s
fondness for natural resources didn’t help, but some
savvy health-care and tech stocks saved the day. Color
me impressed. When a fund you own for its defense
still produces a robust return in a market rally, you
have to feel quite fortunate. Yes, the fund has a large
asset base at nearly
$20
billion, but Romick has done
a remarkable job.
œ
Checking In on Moderate-
Allocation Funds
Tracking Morningstar Analyst Ratings
|
Russel Kinnel
What Are Morningstar
Analyst Ratings?
Our ratings are chosen for long-
term success. Analysts assess
a fund’s competitive advantages
by analyzing people, process,
parent, performance, and price.
They do rigorous analysis and
then submit their ratings to a
committee that vets their work
for thoroughness and consistency.