Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  688 / 772 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 688 / 772 Next Page
Page Background

14

Fund Family Shareholder Association

www.adviseronline.com

AT ITS INCEPTION

in 2005,

Diversified

Equity

was marketed by Vanguard as

a “starter fund for investors seeking

a broadly diversified, low-cost equity

portfolio,” according to then-Vanguard

Chairman Jack Brennan. Some of the

marketing for the fund, in fact, featured

photos of bicycle training wheels.

Calling it a “simplified solution” for an

as-yet unidentified problem, Diversified

Equity would become the only all-equity,

all-active management portfolio among

more than a dozen funds-of-funds at

Vanguard. Large-cap growth and value

funds would soak up about four times

the assets of small- and mid-cap funds,

making it similar in composition to a

broad U.S. market fund like

Total Stock

Market Index

. Then, as now, the fund

offered no international diversification,

which (as Vanguard has made abundant-

ly clear over the years) is so important

that Vanguard now recommends that no

less than 40% of your equity holdings

come from non-U.S. markets.

At introduction on June 10, 2005,

Vanguard cleared up one question, say-

ing the fund would simplify investing

because you’d have “no need to select

individual stock funds that cover various

market segments or to rebalance your

fund allocation to control risk.” They

also said that the fund would give inves-

tors the opportunity to balance their

index fund holdings “with the market-

beating potential of actively managed

funds,” and that with “[Vanguard’s] low

costs and the talents of well-chosen

managers—[Diversified Equity] can

add value to an index portfolio.”

Vanguard even suggested that one

way to use the fund would be to invest

half your money in a broad market

index fund such as Total Stock Market

or

500 Index

, and the other half in

Diversified Equity.

As I’m sure you know, I wasn’t a fan

when the fund was first proposed, and I

was even less of one when it was intro-

duced. But even I didn’t call the fund

the “Stupid Investment of the Week,”

as

MarketWatch

columnist Chuck Jaffe

did. He wasn’t far off.

ToTrack and Lag the Index

So, how’d this “simplified solu-

tion” work out for investors who put

their money into Diversified Equity on

the presumption that Vanguard’s well-

chosen managers and low costs would

add value to their portfolios? Well, let’s

roll the video tape (or the DVR, given

the changes in our media libraries that

we’ve made over the last decade or so).

While the lineup of eight Vanguard

funds has remained the same over the

FUND OF FUNDS

Older and Messier

FUNDS OF FUNDS

Targeting Cheaper Shares

VANGUARD FINALLY TOOK

my advice

and is going to use institutional shares

of its various index funds in its

Target

Retirement

series of funds-of-funds. You

may recall that in 2007 I suggested

that the firm could and should use its

institutional shares to lower the operat-

ing expense ratios on its Target funds,

particularly given that the funds are

components in huge, extremely cost-

efficient 401(k) retirement plans. I raised

the issue again in 2011 when Vanguard

began issuing lower-cost Target shares

to monstrous institutional investors.

Well, now they’ve actually intro-

duced a full lineup of

Institutional

Target Retirement Institutional

shares

(yes, that’s the name). The minimum

investment is a cool $100 million if you

buy one fund, but for institutions or, say,

401(k) plans, it’s $100 million across the

entire family of Targets. Expenses will

run about 0.10%, which is about what

I calculated they’d be years ago had

Vanguard used its lower-priced shares

in the first place. The funds launched

June 26.

What Vanguard doesn’t say in its

prospectus for these new Target funds,

however, is that they specifically will

be using institutional share classes for

these high-minimum funds, which I find

strange. But hey, if you’ve got $100

million to put into

Institutional Target

Retirement 2030 Institutional

, then I

guess you can do your own research.

n

Lower Costs on Target

$100 Million Minimums Ticker

Fund.

No.

Exp.

Ratio $1,000 Minimums

Ticker

Fund.

No.

Exp.

Ratio

Institutional Target 2060 VILVX 1672 0.10% Target Retirement 2060 VTTSX 1691 0.18%

Institutional Target 2055 VIVLX 1671 0.10% Target Retirement 2055 VFFVX 1487 0.18%

Institutional Target 2050 VTRLX 1670 0.10% Target Retirement 2050 VFIFX 699 0.18%

Institutional Target 2045 VITLX 1669 0.10% Target Retirement 2045

VTIVX 306 0.18%

Institutional Target 2040 VIRSX 1668 0.10% Target Retirement 2040

VFORX 696 0.18%

Institutional Target 2035 VITFX 1667 0.10% Target Retirement 2035

VTTHX 305 0.18%

Institutional Target 2030 VTTWX 1666 0.10% Target Retirement 2030

VTHRX 695 0.17%

Institutional Target 2025 VRIVX 1665 0.10% Target Retirement 2025

VTTVX 304 0.17%

Institutional Target 2020 VITWX 1664 0.10% Target Retirement 2020 VTWNX 682 0.16%

Institutional Target 2015 VITVX 1663 0.10% Target Retirement 2015

VTXVX 303 0.16%

Institutional Target 2010 VIRTX 1662 0.10% Target Retirement 2010

VTENX 681 0.16%

Institutional Target Income VITRX 1673 0.10% Target Retirement Income VTINX 308 0.16%