Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  693 / 772 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 693 / 772 Next Page
Page Background

The Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors

August 2015

3

FOR CUSTOMER SERVICE, PLEASE CALL

800-211-7641

Daniel P. Wiener - Senior Editor

Jeffrey D. DeMaso - Editor/Research Director

Seth H. Kennedy - Assistant Editor

Amy Long - Vice President and Publisher

Billy Currano - Senior Managing Editor

David Clarfield - Assistant Managing Editor

Rachel Johnsen - Editorial Assistant

Louisa Dorado - Marketing Director

Mary Southard - Marketing Director

John Hall Design Group - Design and Production

Fund Family Shareholder Association

Member, Newsletter Publishers Association

Daniel P. Wiener - Chairman

James H. Lowell - President

(www.FidelityInvestor.com)

The Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors

(ISSN 1093-4200) is published monthly for members of the Fund Family Shareholder Association

by InvestorPlace Media, LLC, 9201 Corporate Blvd., Rockville MD 20850. A one-year membership is $229 (foreign, add $18).

POSTMASTER: Send address changes to

The Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors

/Fund Family Shareholder Association, c/o InvestorPlace

Media, LLC, 700 Indian Springs Drive, Lancaster, PA 17601.

The FFSA is an independent organization dedicated to providing investors with intelligent and objective advice about the Vanguard family of mutual

funds and services. If you have questions regarding your membership, call 800/211-7641

(service@adviseronline.com

). While the information provided

is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed, nor can the publication be considered liable for

the future investment performance of any securities or strategies discussed. The newsletter, hotline and associated publications provide information

of general interest and are not intended to provide individualized investment advice for any subscriber or specific portfolio. Subscribers are urged to

review the full disclaimer and securities holdings disclosure policy associated with this publication at

www.adviseronline.com/disclosure-disclaimer.

html or call

800-219-8592

to receive a copy via mail. Vanguard and The Vanguard Group are service marks of The Vanguard Group, Inc. FFSA and

InvestorPlace Media, LLC are not affiliated in any way with The Vanguard Group and receive no compensation from The Vanguard Group, Inc.

Copyright 2015 by Fund Family Shareholder Association. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited except by written permission of FFSA.

of the maelstrom that would accom-

pany a 10% correction, the cool heads

at Barrow Hanley, PRIMECAP and

Wellington Management would be

picking up deals left and right.

China Cooling

Greece is so yesterday. This past

month, the action has been in China,

where it appears the economy may be

cooling faster than originally thought.

Don’t take the government’s word for

it, though—they say growth came in

at an annualized 7.0% in Q2, which

seems impossibly right on the money,

hitting the stated 7.0% target perfectly.

Me, I’ve got my eyes on the commod-

ity markets, where gold, copper and oil,

to name an important trio, have been

falling on investors’ assumptions about

declining demand. (More on gold, or

rather

Precious Metals & Mining

, in

a moment.)

Whether you call it interaction, inter-

vention or interference, Shanghai’s stock

market was the poster child for volatility

and uncertainty in July. When the gov-

ernment allows over 1,000 companies to

halt trading in their stocks, manipulates

the use of margin (by relaxing and tight-

ening lending rules), bans IPOs to reduce

supply and tells large investors they can’t

sell while things are going down—well,

to me, that smacks of interference of the

highest order. And it didn’t work. Last

Monday, Shanghai stocks fell 8.5% in a

single trading session. The market ended

the month 29.1% below its June 12 high.

Are the Chinese really succeeding

in shifting their export economy into

a domestic-demand economy without

losing steam? Hard to say, but given

WARMING

FROM PAGE 1

>

their ham-handed attempts to prop up

stocks, you have to wonder whether the

command-control system there really

works when you begin to give peo-

ple some freedoms and they refuse to

march in lockstep.

No, the Chinese markets are not free,

and Vanguard’s insistence that it will

continue with its plans to add mainland

stocks to

Emerging Markets Index

by

following a newly cast FTSE Emerging

Markets All-Cap China A Inclusion

index seems at best ill-advised, though

I can think of one reason they may want

to do it: In buying mainland stocks

now, before MSCI—the big kahuna

of emerging markets indexes—adds

them to its emerging markets index,

Vanguard is essentially front-running a

tidal wave of cash that will eventually

make its way into that market. When

and whether that cash pushes prices up

dramatically remains to be seen. But

as Jeff and I explained last month, the

benefits to being first are pretty darned

slim. Still, they make for good market-

ing.

Total International Stock

lagged

in July with a 0.8% loss. It’s up 4.5%

this year, while my favorite all-weather

foreign fund,

International Growth

,

has generated a 5.5% gain.

Getting back to gold and falling com-

modity prices, July was a month that

the few die-hard investors remaining

in Precious Metals & Mining will want

to forget. The fund’s 16.2% decline

ranks as the 12th worst month in the

fund’s history—though it pales beside

the 39.9% fall in October 2008. When

times are good, this fund can glitter.

But the bad times are really, really bad,

and they’ve been terrible now for years.

Precious Metals & Mining had a three-

year stretch from 2011-2013 as the

worst-performing fund in Vanguard’s

stable, and followed that up in 2014

as the second worst performer. With

July’s tumble, the fund established a

new MCL (maximum cumulative loss),

down 72.6% from its high reached

before the credit crisis in May 2008. All

this in the midst of a bull market!

True contrarians may be drawn to

invest here, but you’ll need a cast-iron

stomach to handle the ride. In all hon-

esty, how much of your portfolio would

you really want to stake on this volatile

sector? A 5% position would be large,

in my view, wouldn’t add much on the

way up—but could certainly induce

plenty of stress on the way down.

One fund that has begun to rise,

phoenix-like, from its ashes is

Prime

Money Market

. Its yield has risen

from just 0.01% on May 29 to the recent

0.04% hit on Monday, while the yields

on all of Vanguard’s other money funds

remain anchored at 0.01%. What’s

going on? I don’t have a clue, but I’m

guessing expenses are being cut to the

bone. Fee waivers, which Vanguard

maintains are temporary though they’ve

been in place for years now, are going

up. Over the past two years, fee waivers

on

Prime Money Market

alone have

jumped from $3.3 million to $8.1 mil-

lion, a 150% rise, while assets are up

just 9.6% over the same period.

So, forget “investing” in cash or in

gold, but do continue to hold to a well-

diversified portfolio of great managers.

Our

Model Portfolios

are handling the

market turns just fine, and the

Growth

Model Portfolio

, up 5.1% this year,

is ahead of Total Stock Market, Total

International Stock and

Total Bond

Market

. That should give you a nice,

warm feeling.

n