Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  75 / 236 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 75 / 236 Next Page
Page Background

DISCUSSION

Physicians, from primary care physicians to otolar-

yngologists, can differentiate the proposed division of

CRS. The subclasses of CRS can be easily determined

from clinical history and readily accessible laboratory or

office testing (Fig. 6). Diagnosis for CF, allergic fungal si-

nusitis, and aspirin triad are well described in the

literature. Patients with allergy and asthma can be diag-

nosed with office or laboratory testing, and CRS can

then be divided as described in Figure 6. The proposed

subclassification of CRS does not require difficult and

expensive laboratory testing such as proteomics or

microarray. The general characteristics of the CRS sub-

classes are described in Figure 7

.

By dividing CRS into

this subclassification, effective targeted management

can be developed for each category of CRS. Also, by

defining the type of CRS that is being evaluated in

either bench or clinical research study, the research data

will hopefully become coherent and produce better

research outcomes.

Nonasthmatic Sinusitis Without Allergy

Typically, NASsA patients have purulence on their

nasal endoscopy and do not have high CT scores (Fig. 8).

The biopsy of the sinus mucosa is not hypercellular and

does not have an abundant amount of eosinophils in the

mucosa. Structural abnormality due to anatomic var-

iants may be a factor in these patients, such as concha

bullosa, infraorbital ethmoid air cell, and deviated sep-

tum, that predisposes them to persistent bacterial sinus

infections.

7

These sinus infections can occur after a viral

exacerbation that leads to persistent cyclical bacterial

infections (Fig. 9).

NASsA is similar to noneosinophilic sinusitis, which

has been previously described.

8

NASsA has an extrinsic

mucosal inflammation that is steered through T helper

cells, CD3

1

CD4

1

. The inflammation in NASsA is

termed extrinsic, because the inflammation is not

derived from the mucosa but rather from an external

source such as an infection that has been distinguished

with elevated levels of IFN-

c

. IFN-

c

is a Th1 cytokine

commonly representing an infectious process. NASsA

patients have elevated levels of IL6 or IL8, similar to

noneosinophilic sinusitis and may benefit from long-

term macrolide therapy.

8

It is possible that innate im-

munity may be involved in NASsA patients, but it was

not evaluated in this study. Hypoxia is also likely to be a

factor in these NASsA patients due to sinus ostium

obstruction.

9

NASsA patients can often improve with a combina-

tion of oral antibiotics and steroids. For those NASsA

patients who do not improve with medical management,

ESS is a good subsequent treatment. However, there are

NASsA patients who have recalcitrant bacterial sinus

infections that persist despite properly opening the

sinuses and being treated with culture-directed antibiot-

ics. The most likely explanation for the obstinate low-

grade bacterial infection causing localized inflammation

is bony bacterial infection or biofilm. Bacterial biofilm in

CRS has been shown to be a Th1-mediated process.

10

Management of bacterial biofilm is difficult, and multi-

modality treatment may be necessary to improve these

patients. Multimodality treatment will likely include

high-dose topical antibiotics with or without topical sur-

factant after mechanical irritation such as ESS or high-

pressure irrigation of the sinuses.

Nonasthmatic Sinusitis With Allergy

If an inflammatory pathway continuum existed

with NASsA on one end and AScA on the other spec-

trum, then NAScA would be between them. NAScA

inflammatory pathway is also likely to be directed by T

helper cells, because CD3

1

CD4

1

was higher in this

group versus the control group. Even though NAScA

had significantly higher levels of IFN-

c

than the control

group, NAScA is likely a combination of an infectious

TABLE VI.

Average Percentage of CD45

1

Cells, CD45

1

CD4

1

Cells, and

CD45

1

CD4

2

Cells With Positive Intracellular Markers.

CRS Subclass

IFN

IL4

IL5

IL13

IL17

Average % of CD45

1

cells with positive intracellular marker

AERD

3.9 1.8

0.2

0.3

0.7

AFS

3.1 1

1.3

1.5

2.4

CF

14.6 0.2

0.8

2

2.7

AScA

12.1 1.3

0.04 0.1

1.3

ASsA

9

3.2

0.2

0.5

2.2

NAScA

14

1.2

0.4

0.3

0.7

NASsA

15.5 0.8

0.1

1.8

1.9

Control

4.4 1.2

0.3

0.4

1.8

Total

9.6 1.2

0.4

0.8

1.6

Average % of CD45

1

CD4

1

cells with positive intracellular marker

AERD

2.6 1.4

0.3

0.4

1.7

AFS

2.3 0.9

2.4

3.2

4

CF

8.6 0.4

0.5

0.3

3.9

AScA

9.7 1.8

0.04 0.2

3.4

ASsA

11.9 3.2

0.2

0.6

2.9

NAScA

22.1 1.3

0.6

0.4

1.9

NASsA

24.4 3

0.2

2.4

2.8

Control

4.1 1.2

0.2

0.6

3.1

Total

11.6 1.7

0.5

0.9

2.9

Average % of CD45

1

CD4

2

cells with positive intracellular marker

AERD

6.5 1.9

0.4

0.6

0.4

AFS

3.6 1.2

0.7

0.6

1.7

CF

17.7 0.04 0.9

2.7

0.9

AScA

10.5 1

0.02 0.1

1.2

ASsA

10

2.5

0.02 0.2

0.6

NAScA

12.9 0.3

0.3

0.3

0.6

NASsA

14.7 0.7

0.07 0.3

1.2

Control

4.8 0.9

0.3

0.4

1.1

Total

9.7 1

0.4

0.6

0.9

AERD

5

aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease also known as aspirin

triad; AFS

5

allergic fungal sinusitis; AScA

5

asthmatic sinusitis with allergy;

ASsA

5

asthmatic sinusitis without allergy; CF

5

cystic fibrosis; CRS

5

chronic

rhinosinusitis; IFN

5

interferon; IL

5

interleukin; NAScA

5

nonasthmatic sinusi-

tis with allergy; NASsA

5

nonasthmatic sinusitis without allergy.

Laryngoscope 123: March 2013

Han:

Subclassification

of Chronic

Sinusitis

53