1820-1821 / 2239
Typical Peer Review process:
Physicist in charge sets out a work plan and schedule
•
Includes literature review, manufacturers data
Preliminary meeting (critical audience!)
•
Background theory if appropriate
•
Risk analysis (databases?)
•
Tests to be undertaken
•
Detectors and techniques used
•
Final plan
Utretch 2016
Regular updates
Final Peer Review
•
Results, analysis and comparison with existing data
•
Training and implementation plan
•
Ongoing QC
Documentation
•
QART signoff
Presentation to clinicians and other interested parties