![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0293.jpg)
Conclusions: measurement vs calculation in solid phantoms
•It is important to understand how the TPS handles different materials and reports dose.
•We have been working on the assumption that homogeneous solid phantoms which are shown to be
water-equivalent for reference dosimetry and relevant dosimetry using an ionization chamber are also
water-equivalent under a multiple beam arrangements (for the verification of treatment plans).
•The water-equivalence of complex phantoms with embedded detector systems (not necessarily ionization
chambers) and their comparison TPS calculations in these phantoms is an area where more investigations
are needed.
Does what I
see agree
with
calculations?
Are we
comparing
the same
thing?