Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1283 / 1424 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1283 / 1424 Next Page
Page Background

1283

cooperating and collaborating towards a comprehensive, ever more complete

realisation.

Which brings me to the question of inspiration.

I don’t see how anybody could object to the fact of the Mother’s appointment of a

particular architect for Her city.

An architect is necessary. An architect is an architect; he is also a human being,

and perhaps a sadhak.

This appointment does not constitute a fiat on the whole of the experiment, it does

not make the architect a leader or a king or a divine messenger. It is simply the

allotment of a task to one of Her children. And “come what may”!

For there are all the other necessary tasks and instruments, too.

When the Mother wanted, in January 1970, to have the plans drawn of Her direct

vision of the Inner Room of the Matrimandir, She specifically did not want an

architect to do it; She asked for an engineer to provide Her with an exact rendition

of Her detailed vision.

In this matter She did not want anyone to tamper with Her direct “inspiration”, of

which She guaranteed the source.

For many years, as we were building the structure of the Matrimandir and then of

its Inner Room, there was constantly, and despite all the difficulties, a sense of

evidence and timelessness.

To my experience, this sense is the expression of a sanction, of the highest

sanction.

This sense has gradually got covered, obscured, as we moved in to the completion

phase and, in the absence of clear plans and technical solutions, our many little

minds and preferences entered into the fray.

This became acute in 1987, when the triangular beam-structure got completed, and

no one really knew how to go about the outer completion of the sphere. This was

when the “chief architect” returned to Auroville, after about 10 years of absence;

this was also when his concept, modified here and there, of the gilded discs on the

sphere and the petals around it, was voted with a count of raised hands in a large

and long community meeting – without the slightest idea of how to execute it.

I have worked closely with the “chief architect” after his return to Auroville in the

late 80’s, during his twice-yearly stays, mostly over the Petals – where to locate the

rooms, which shape to give them, how to provide practical access, how to structure

the main volumes – and later over a number of details in and around the sphere. I

have never found him to be particularly inspired, not any more than any one of us.

Rather, I found him easily influenced, to the extent that he would change his

designs innumerable times as long as the inspiration came through “his people”.

And I came to the conclusion that what was and still is most important to him is the

matter of authority: he demands to have the final say, with the proviso that he, and

only he, can change it.

Thus, like a small king who welcomes bad advice from his courtiers and refuses or

ignores good advice from those over whom he holds no sway, we have a “chief

architect” who is addicted to authority for its own sake. A psychological context that

is far from conducive to an effective collaboration of the energies available,

wherein, if you are not “for”, you must be “against”.