42 / 453
(53 0((7,1*6
REVIEWERS PRESENT THEIR REVIEWS AND MAY INITIATE A
MOTION TO ADOPT THE METHOD IF THEY CHOOSE
Chair recognizes the reviewers
Primary and secondary
ͬ ZW
reviews are presented.
If in favor, they may make and second a motion to adopt or not
adopt the method
Chair can then entertain discussion on the method
Chair can call for a vote once deliberation is complete
(53 0((7,1* 'LVFXVVLRQV
In your collective judgment is the method scientifically sound and
,
can be followed as written?
In your collective judgment, does the method sufficiently meet
the Standard Method Performance Requirements (SMPR)?
In your collective judgment, what are the strengths and
weaknesses of the method?
In your collective judgment, do the weaknesses outweigh the
strengths in your recommendation for the method?
In your collective judgment, is the method safe and can it serve
well the stakeholder community that will use the it?
In your collective judgment, is additional information needed to
before considering this method for First Action OMA status?