Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  7 / 453 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 453 Next Page
Page Background

EXPERT REVIEW PANEL (ERP) FOR MICROBIOLOGY FOR FOOD AND ENVIRONMENTAL SURFACES

*Agenda is subject to change. V1

Page 1 of 1

AOAC INTERNATIONAL Headquarters

2275 Research Blvd, Suite 300

Rockville, Maryland 20850

Thursday, January 19, 2017

8:30AM – 12:00PM (EST)

Meeting Room: Boardroom

MEETING AGENDA

Expert Review Panel Co-Chairs: Wendy McMahon, Silliker, Inc. and Michael Brodsky, Brodsky Consultants

I.

Welcome and Introductions

Expert Review Panel Co-Chairs

II.

Review of AOAC Volunteer Policies & Expert Review Panel Process Overview and Guidelines

Deborah McKenzie, Senior Director, Standards Development and Method Approval Processes, AOAC

INTERNATIONAL and AOAC Research Institute

III.

Review of Methods

For each method the assigned ERP members will present a review of the proposed collaborative study manuscript,

after which the ERP will discuss the method and render a decision on the status for each method.

1)

OMAMAN-35: Evaluation of the 3M

Molecular Detection Assay(MDA) 2 -

E. coli

(including H7)

for the Detection of

E. coli

O157:H7 Species in Selected Foods: Collaborative Study

Co-Study Directors: Lisa Monteroso, 3M Food Safety, 3M Center, Building 260-06B-01, St. Paul, MN 55144

and Leslie Thompson, Vanguard Sciences, 224 N. Derby Lane, North Sioux City, SD 57049

2)

OMAMAN-36: Evaluation of the

mericon® E. coli

O157 Screen Plus and

mericon E. coli

STEC O-

Type Pathogen Detection Assays in Select Foods: Collaborative Study

Co-Study Directors: Marcia Armstrong, QIAGEN, 19300 Germantown Rd., Germantown, MD

20874 and Patrick Bird, Q Laboratories, 1400 Harrison Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45214

IV.

Discuss Final Action Requirements for First Action Official Methods

(if applicable)

ERP will discuss, review and track First Action methods for 2 years after adoption, review any additional information

(i.e., additional collaborative study data, proficiency testing, and other feedback) and make recommendations to

the Official Methods Board regarding Final Action status.

V.

Adjournment