Background Image
Previous Page  68 / 104 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 68 / 104 Next Page
Page Background

68

ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS OF

CONVENTIONAL INTENSIFICATION AND

EXPANSION OF FOOD PRODUCTION

Modern agricultural methods and technologies brought spec-

tacular increases in food production (Tilman

et al

., 2002), but

not without high environmental costs. Efforts to boost food

production, for example, through direct expansion of cropland

and pastures, will negatively affect the capacity of ecosystems to

support food production and to provide other essential services.

Food production will undoubtedly be affected by external fac-

tors such as climate change, but the production and distribu-

tion of food is itself is also a major cause of climate change.

Despite its crucial role in feeding the world population, ag-

riculture remains the largest driver of genetic erosion, spe-

cies loss and conversion of natural habitats (MA, 2005). The

conversion of natural habitats to cropland and other uses

typically entails the replacement of systems rich in biodiver-

sity with monocultures or systems poor in biodiversity. Large-

scale agriculture brings ecosystem simplification and loss of

(bio)diversity, thus reducing the potential to provide ecosys-

tem services other than food production. Of some 270,000

known species of higher plants, about 10,000 –15,000 are ed-

EXPANSION OF CROP- AND RANGELANDS

ible and only about 7,000 are used in agriculture. However,

globalization and agricultural intensification have diminished

the varieties traditionally used, with only 30% of the available

crop varieties dominating global agriculture. These, together

with only 14 animals species, provide an estimated 90% of the

world’s consumed calories (FAO,1998).

Habitat modification through agriculture and a variety of other

causes is, in general, the most important factor in increasing

species’ risk of extinction. Most of this habitat loss arises from

encroaching farmland and habitat conversion for food and bio-

fuel production (Figures 25, 26 and 27). Clearance for cropland

or permanent pasture has reduced the extent of natural habi-

tats on arable land by more than 50% (Green

et al

., 2005), with

much of the rest altered by temporary grazing (Groombridge

and Jenkins, 2002). Habitat modification already affects more

than 80% of the globally threatened mammals, birds and plants

(Groombridge and Jenkins, 2002), with serious implications

for ecosystem services and human wellbeing. Indeed, the most

significant threat by far to the world’s 5,500 mammal species