Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  132 / 158 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 132 / 158 Next Page
Page Background

ANNUAL REPORT 2016 – BOSKALIS

132

To: the Shareholders and Supervisory Board of Royal Boskalis

Westminster N.V.

REPORT ON THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2016 INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT

OUR OPINION

We have audited the financial statements 2016 of Royal Boskalis

Westminster N.V. (also referred to as the company), based in

Sliedrecht, the Netherlands. The financial statements include the

consolidated financial statements and the company financial

statements.

In our opinion:

‚

The accompanying consolidated financial statements give a true

and fair view of the financial position of Royal Boskalis

Westminster N.V. as at 31 December 2016, its result and its cash

flows for 2016 in accordance with International Financial

Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (EU-IFRS)

and with Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.

‚

The accompanying company financial statements give a true and

fair view of the financial position of Royal Boskalis Westminster

N.V. as at 31 December 2016 and of its result for 2016 in

accordance with Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.

The consolidated financial statements comprise:

‚

The consolidated statement of financial position as at

31 December 2016

‚

The following statements for 2016: the consolidated statement

of profit or loss, the consolidated statement of other comprehensive

income, the consolidated statement of cash flows and the

consolidated statement of changes in the equity

‚

The notes comprising a summary of the significant accounting

policies applied and other explanatory information

The company financial statements comprise:

‚

The company statement of financial position as at 31 December

2016

‚

The following statements for 2016: the company statement of

profit or loss and the company statement of changes in

shareholders’ equity

‚

The notes comprising a summary of the accounting policies

applied and other explanatory information

BASIS FOR OUR OPINION

We conducted our audit in accordance with Dutch law, including

the Dutch Standards on Auditing. Our responsibilities under those

standards are further described in the “Our responsibilities for the

audit of the financial statements” section of our report.

We are independent of Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V. in

accordance with the

Verordening inzake de onafhankelijkheid van

accountants bij assurance-opdrachten

(ViO, Code of Ethics for

Professional Accountants, a regulation with respect to independence)

and other relevant independence regulations in the Netherlands.

Furthermore we have complied with the

Verordening gedrags- en

beroepsregels accountants

(VGBA, Dutch Code of Ethics).

We believe the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and

appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

MATERIALITY

We also take misstatements and/or possible misstatements into

account that in our judgment are material for the users of the

financial statements for qualitative reasons.

We agreed with the Supervisory Board that misstatements in

excess of EUR 0.8 million, which are identified during the audit,

would be reported to them, as well as smaller misstatements that in

our view must be reported on qualitative grounds.

SCOPE OF THE GROUP AUDIT

Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V. is at the head of a group of

entities. The financial information of this group is included in the

consolidated financial statements of Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V.

Our group audit mainly focused on significant group entities and

joint ventures in terms of size and/or risk, within the operating

segments Dredging & Inland Infra, Offshore Energy and Towage &

Salvage. We performed most of the audit procedures at those

segments ourselves. For the audit work in amongst others

Australia, Mexico, Singapore, Germany and the UK, we used

MATERIALITY

EUR 16.0 million

(2015: EUR 26.6 million)

BENCHMARK

APPLIED

Approximately 5% of profit before

taxation adjusted for impairment losses

EXPLANATION

Based on our professional judgment we

consider an earnings-based measure as

the most appropriate basis to determine

materiality. We consider that profit

before taxation is an important metric

for the financial performance of the

company. We have excluded the

impairment losses from the basis of

calculation, given the nature of this item.

INDEPENDENT

AUDITOR’S REPORT