Previous Page  29 / 56 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 56 Next Page
Page Background

Nielsen Career

Consulting

Career Counseling

For Attorneys

Strategies and support for

your career in or out of the

law

30 Years of Experience

Over 3500 Clients

Sheila Nielsen, MSW, JD

The Park Monroe

65 E. Monroe St., Ste. 4301

Chicago, IL 60603

(312) 340-4433

www.nielsencareerconsulting.com

for delaying enforcement or appeal of the

order or enters an order which disposes of

that last lingering party and claim.

Kral

v. FredHill Press Co.

, 304 Ill.App.3d 988,

992-94 (1st Dist. 1999);

Mares v. Metzler

,

87 Ill.App.3d 881, 883-85 (1st Dist.

1980);

Dubina v. Mesirow Realty Develop-

ment, Inc

., 178 Ill.2d 496, 502-03 (1990).

Armed with this body of law (the

Kral,

Mares,

and

Dubina

decisions), you need to

examine every pleading in the case and find

that one unadjudicated claim or party. It

might be, as in

Mares

, a defendant who was

never served with process, or, as in

Kral

, a

defendant who filed bankruptcy and whom

everyone forgot about. It might be a bogus

counterclaim filed by some defendant that

everyone knows was filed only as a bargain-

ing chip and that everyone disregarded.

Or perhaps you will find that the default

judgment was entered against your client

on less than all counts of the complaint,

and there remains a lingering count that

was never disposed of. Without a 304(a)

finding, any one of those things will trigger

the

Kral-Mares-Dubina

doctrine and make

your motion to vacate the judgment timely.

This does not necessarily mean that the

judgment

must

be vacated, only that the

motion to vacate the judgment is timely no

matter when it is filed.

Kral

, 304 Ill.App.3d

at 994. You will still have to convince the

court that your client is such a sterling

fellow that he deserves to have the judg-

ment vacated. But, it does enable you to

circumvent the two year limitation of 735

ILCS 5/2-1401, which otherwise would

have been an insurmountable hurdle.

Service of the 2-1401 Motion

Ordinarily, a section 2-1401 motion must

be served by summons, registered mail

or publication. S. Ct. Rules 105(b), 106.

However, if an attorney for the respondent

on a 2-1401 motion is actively represent-

ing the respondent in ancillary matters

before the court in the same case, such

as post-judgment collection proceedings,

the motion may simply be mailed by first

class mail to that attorney.

Onewest Bank,

FSB v. Topar

, 2013 IL App (1st) 120010,

¶ 19;

Welfelt v. Schultz Transit Co.

, 144

Ill.App.3d 767, 772-73 (1st Dist. 1986);

Public Taxi Service, Inc. v. Ayrton

, 15 Ill.

App.3d 706, 712 (1st Dist. 1973).

In our hypothetical at the outset of this

article, there was indeed an ancillary matter

pending before the court: the judgment

creditor’s attorney had issued a citation

to discover assets pursuant to 735 ILCS

2-1402 (that’s 1402, not 1401), and so

you would simply serve your motion and

notice of motion on her.

Richard Lee Stavins is a shareholder in the

law firm of Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd.

in Chicago. He concentrates his practice in

trial and appellate litigation. He is a member

of the CBA Tort Litigation Committee and

serves on the

CBA Record

Editorial Board.

Pro Bono Support

Are you looking for a pro bono opportunity that

fits your skills, interests and availability? The

CBF Pro Bono Support Program is here to help

connect you to meaningful pro bono volunteer

opportunities that are a good fit for you.To learn

more about potential volunteer opportuni-

ties, go to

www.chicagobarfoundation.org/

resources/pro-bono or Contact Angela Inzano

at 312/554-4952 for assistance getting involved.

#FBF #CBAHistory

The Chicago Bar Association

Standing over the entrance to the CBA

Building is the male figure of Justice

by sculptor Mary Block. The cast

aluminum sculpture balances on the

book of law while holding a bird (peace)

in his right hand and a globe

(the global nature of life) in his left.

CBA RECORD

29