Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  286 / 471 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 286 / 471 Next Page
Page Background

© 2015 AOAC INTERNATIONAL

using an analytical balance. Elute the cartridge with additional 3 ×

1 mL hexane–dichloromethane (3 + 1, v/v) and collect in three

evaporation tubes/flasks of known empty weight.

(

e

) Evaporate the four elution fractions to dryness and

gravimetrically determine the amount of fat eluting in each fraction

by subtracting the empty weights from newly recorded weights

after solvent evaporation. There should be no fat eluting in the

optimum elution fraction for PAHs (this can also be observed

visually in the tubes).

(

f

) If there is fat coeluting with PAHs, then the PAH and fat

elution profiles have to be reexamined to determine optimum

elution volume for PAH and fat separation (potentially sacrificing

up to 5% of late-eluting PAH amounts if necessary) or a different

silica gel cartridge has to be used.

Table 2014.08E. Analyte concentrations in the mixed stock

standard solution

Analyte

Concentration, µg/mL

Anthracene

10

Benz[

a

]anthracene

10

Benzo[

a

]pyrene

10

Benzo[

b

]fluoranthene

10

Benzo[

g,h,i

]perylene

10

Benzo[

k

]fluoranthene

10

Chrysene

25

Dibenz[

a,h

]anthracene

10

Fluoranthene

25

Fluorene

10

Indeno[1,2,3-

cd

]pyrene

10

Naphthalene

50

Phenanthrene

25

Pyrene

25

1-Methylnaphthalene

25

2,6-Dimethylnaphthalene

25

1-Methylphenanthrene

25

1,7-Dimethylphenanthrene

10

3-Methylchrysene

25

Table 2014.08F. Dilution scheme for preparation of the

calibration standard solutions

Calibration

level

Vol. of mixed

stock standard

solution, µL

Vol. of working

PAH solution

a

,

µL

Vol. of working

PAH

solution B, µL

Vol. of

13

C-PAH

1 µg/mL solution,

µL

Final

vol.

a

, µL

1

50

50

1000

2

100

50

1000

3

200

50

1000

4

500

50

1000

5

100

50

1000

6

200

50

1000

7

500

50

1000

8

100

50

1000

a

 Bring to volume using isooctane.

G. GC/MS Analysis

(

a

) 

GC conditions.

—Table

2014.08G

provides GC conditions

that were used by the collaborative study participants. Other

conditions (e.g., column, temperature and flow program, and

injection technique and volume) can be used as long as the

laboratory qualification criteria for separation, sensitivity, and

linearity are met. The injection temperature or program needs to

be optimized to enable quantitative transfer of less volatile PAHs.

If programmable temperature vaporizer (PTV) solvent vent mode

is used, solvent venting parameters (temperature, time, flow,

pressure) need to be carefully optimized to prevent losses of the

volatile PAHs, especially naphthalene. The separation criteria

(demonstrated in Figure

2014.08C

) include (

1

) a baseline separation

of benzo[

a

]pyrene and benzo[

e

]pyrene (concentration ratio of 1:5),

(

2

) at least 50% valley separation of anthracene and phenanthrene

(concentration ratio 1:2.5; evaluated for the anthracene peak),

and (

3

) at least 50% valley separation for benzo[

b

]fluoranthene,

benzo[

j

]fluoranthene, and benzo[

k

]fluoranthene (concentration

ratio of 1:1:1).

Note

: Criteria for separation of chrysene and

triphenylene (another PAH critical pair) were not set for the

collaborative study. For accurate quantitation of chrysene, at least

50% valley separation is recommended, which can be achieved

using selective stationary phases.

The maximum oven temperature program may not exceed the

maximum temperature limit for a given column. Backbone-modified

columns, such as Rxi-17Sil MS or DB-17MS, are recommended

for their better temperature stability and also good selectivity for

critical PAH pairs or groups, including the anthracene/phenanthrene

pair or benzofluoranthenes. Conduct proper inlet and column

maintenance to ensure adequate operation of the GC instrument.

Perform system checks.

(

b

) 

MS conditions.

—AnyGC/MS instrument (single quadrupole,

triple quadrupole, TOF, or ion trap) with EI may be used as long as it

provides results meeting the laboratory qualification requirements.

The 10 study participants used the following instruments: single

quadrupole (Agilent 5973–Laboratory 4; Agilent 5975B XL Inert–

Laboratories 3 and 8–10; Agilent 5975C–Laboratories 6 and 7),

triple quadrupole (Agilent 7000B–Laboratory 5; Thermo TSQ–

Laboratory 1), and time-of-flight (Leco Pegasus 4D–Laboratory 2).

Pay special attention to the optimization of the MS transfer line

and MS source temperature. Higher MS source temperatures

Figure 2014.08B. An example of elution profiles of PAHs on a silica gel SPE cartridge and

determination of the optimum elution volume.

Optimum elution volume

Figure 2014.08B. An example of elution profiles of PAHs

on a silica gel SPE cartridge and determination of the

optimum elution volume.

Candidates for 2016 Method of the Year

227