Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  430 / 471 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 430 / 471 Next Page
Page Background

© 2012 AOAC INTERNATIONAL

where m′

i

= mass fraction of FAME

i

in the calibration standard

solution,

D

(

q

); A′

O

= peak area of C11:0 in the calibration standard

solution chromatogram; m′

O

= mass of C11:0 in the calibration

standard solution,

D

(

q

); and A′

i

= peak area of FAME

i

in the

calibration standard solution chromatogram.

The variation between three injections is optimal when

coefficients of variation are less than 2.

Note

: The response factors calculated for C18:2 n-6 could be

applied for C-18:2 CLA and that calculated for C18:3 n-3

cis

could

be applied for C18:3

trans

isomers.

(

3

)

Determination of the test portion

.—Inject 1 μL of the test

portion,

F

(

b

), into the gas chromatograph applying the same

conditions as used in the calibrating solution.

(

b

)

Fatty acid identification

.—Identify the fatty acids in the

sample solution chromatogram by comparing their retention times

with those of the corresponding peaks in the calibration standard

solution,

D

(

q

), and in the qualitative standard mixture containing

TFAs and CLA,

D

(

o

).

C18:1 TFA

.—Identify and group all TFA of C18:1 (include also

the peak area of

trans

C18:1

trans

Δ16 eluted in the

cis

C18:1 region

just after the oleic acid) according to Figures

2012.13A

and

B

.

Note

: When milk fat is present, two trans isomers of C18:1 are

eluted in the

cis

C18:1 region (the C18:1

trans

Δ15 and C18:1

trans

Δ16, respectively), but only one (C18:1

trans

Δ16) is resolved with

the 100 m length capillary column. The second isomer (C18:1

trans

Δ15) is generally overlapped with the oleic acid peak (C18:1

cis

Δ9) and its area is only quantifiable using a preliminary separation

(TLC Ag

+

, HPLC Ag

+

) followed by a capillary GLC analysis.

According to recent findings, it has been demonstrated that there is

not significant difference of total C18:1

trans

amount when the area

of C18:1

trans

Δ15 (not resolved peak) is not included in the sum

in comparison to the result obtained after preliminary separation

techniques (Ag

+

) followed by a capillary GLC analysis. A part

of this phenomenon is explained by presence of some C18:1

cis

isomers (Δ6-8) which elute in the C18:1

trans

and consequently are

indirectly added to the sum of C18:1

trans

and compensate the fact

that C18:1

trans

Δ15 is not taken into account.

C18:2 TFA

.—Identify and group all TFA of linoleic (C18:2 n-6)

acids (

see

Figures

2012.13A

and

B

). For the total TFA of C18:2,

include all the

trans

isomers present in milk fat sample as shown in

Figures

2012.13A

and

B

.

C18:3 TFA

.—Identify and group all TFAof linolenic (C18:3 n-3)

acids (

see

Figures

2012.13A

and

B

).

Note

: In presence of milk fat and/or fish oil in the sample,

another isomer of C20:1 elutes just before C20:1 n-9. Depending

on the column resolution, the retention time of this fatty acid may

also correspond to a

trans

isomer of C18:3 n-3 (the c,t,c or t,c,c).

When there is only one peak in the corresponding zone of C18:3

TFA, its correct identification corresponds to a C20:1 isomer. When

two, three, or four peaks are encountered in the corresponding

zone for C18:3 TFA, each peak area should be included in the

total areas of C18:3 TFA (

see

elution order and formation rules

below). Interferences could be also observed between C18:3 TFA

isomers (C18:3 c,c,t; c,t,c; or t,c,c) and C20:1 n-9. When C20:1

n-9 elute with C18:3 c,t,c, (the minor C18:3 TFA isomer), their

contribution on the total C18:3 TFA is negligible. However, if

C20:1 n-9 is interfered with C18:3 c,c,t or with C18:3 t,c,c the

chromatography conditions should be slightly modified to obtain

sufficient separation. Interference is also visible when wrong ratio

between C18:3 n-3 c,c,t and C18:3 n-3 t,c,c is observed (normal

ratio is always 5:4).

The kinetics of C18:3

trans

isomers formation in refined and

deodorized oils have been analyzed using highly polar capillary

column and described in the literature. They could be used as a

Figure 2012.13A. Example of GC chromatogram (enlarged view of C18:1 TFA, C18:2 TFA, and CLA) using split injection.

Candidates for 2016 Method of the Year

365