Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  467 / 471 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 467 / 471 Next Page
Page Background

MEMORANDUM 

D

ATE

:  

October 13, 2014 

T

O

AOAC® O

FFICIAL

M

ETHODS

B

OARD

M

EMBERS

F

ROM

:  

D

ARRYL

S

ULLIVAN

, CHAIR – AOAC ERP

ON

SPIFAN N

UTRIENT

M

ETHODS

S

UBJECT

Final Action Method Recommendations – Responses to OMB 

____________________________________________________________________________ 

AOAC OMA # OMB Comments 

ERP Chair Responses 

2011.20 

Nucleotides 

1.

Return to ERP; answer questions from user 

comments page 77 of the OMB meeting book 

(9‐11‐14) 

a.

OMB approves final action status on 

this method, upon response from the 

ERP that user comments were 

addressed 

USER COMMENTS:   

The ERP reviewed the comments from one 

laboratory regarding the method being time 

consuming and not complete.  The ERP agreed 

that this comment did not reflect the overall 

quality of the study. 

2012.10 

Vitamins A & 

1.

ERP recognizes & accepted that the 

reproducibility (RSDR) for cis vitamin A in 

some samples were higher than the SMPR 

requirement 

a.

The level of cis vitamin A were low in 

corresponding samples 

2.

Return to ERP; answer questions from user 

comments page 80 of the OMB meeting book 

(9‐11‐14) 

a.

OMB approves final action status on 

this method, upon response from the 

ERP that user comments were 

addressed 

USER COMMENTS:  

The ERP reviewed the comments from one 

laboratory suggesting that the chromatography 

required improvement.  All of the other 

participating labs found the chromatography to 

be acceptable. The ERP agreed that this 

comment did not reflect the true quality of the 

study. 

2012.13 

Fatty Acids 

1.

SMPR was not met 

2.

ERP recognizes & accepted that the 

reproducibility (RSDR) for trans fatty acid in 

some samples were higher than the SMPR 

requirement 

3.

The level of trans fatty acid were low in 

corresponding samples 

4.

Documentation by ERP that safety concerns 

were addressed 

5.

Modify safety concerns in OMA – refer to 

USER COMMENTS:  

The ERP reviewed the user comments 

regarding simplifying the sample preparation 

procedure and the addition of more standards. 

Since the sample preparation and standards 

were acceptable to all other laboratories, the 

ERP agreed that these comments did not reflect 

the overall quality of the study. 

Candidates for 2016 Method of the Year

388