Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  43 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 43 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

43

11 Deviations from, and adjustments

to the annual work plan

With regard to financial expenditures, the

UNEP Shelf Pro-

gramme

required an additional allocation of funds during

2011. At the start of the year, 6 million NOK were allocated

from the 2011 budget to support the Norwegian Initiative.

During the year an increased level of support to countries

under the Norwegian Initiative was delivered, which was

not anticipated, resulting in additional costs of 2.2 MNOK.

For activities in West Africa, the purchase of software and

hardware (2.85 MNOK) was an extraordinary cost item not

previously incurred for any other region or country. Op-

erational costs (including workshops, data acquisition,

and other support to the region) were also higher than

anticipated due to additional, unforeseen interventions

required for successful programme delivery. The funding

shortfall was communicated during the course of the year

to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

88

Subsequent to this, the

Ministry agreed to cover the additional costs.

The

Mitigation and Adaptation Information Network

(MAIN)

project was brought to a close in 2011 as it proved

challenging to develop deliverables with a clear impact.

This decision was made in consultation with partners and

is based on recommendations from a paper prepared in

collaboration with UNEP/Risøe in December 2010 that

assessed experiences of ICT-based networks for capacity

development in the area of renewable energy. The study

highlighted preconditions for success, including a clearly

defined target audience; a well-developed network of lo-

cal partners (NGOs working on the ground) that could

help bridge the “digital divide”; clear specification of value

added; tools, products, and services relevant to end-us-

ers; and significant levels of funding (larger projects than

MAIN had failed). Following the review of implementation

progress and, in light of insights gained from similar pro-

jects, it was decided to terminate GRID-Arendal’s engage-

ment in MAIN from mid-2011.

88. Ref. letter to the ministry for the attention of Mr Harald Noreik,

dated 2 December 2011.

12 Assessment of effectiveness

The Framework Agreement between the Norwegian Min-

istry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) and GRID-Arendal, dated

28 April 2010, prescribes an assessment at the end of the

biennium of the effectiveness of the Work Programme un-

der the Programme Cooperation Agreement (PCA). The

point of departure for an assessment of the ‘effectiveness’

of the Work Programme – defined as “the extent to which

the purpose has been achieved” – is the first clause of the

Framework Agreement:

“The overall goal...is to support UNEPwithGRID-Arendal’s

core competencies in creating innovative communication

tools, products and services that draw from scientific

assessments and present complex information in a manner

that is compelling to a wide range of audiences.”

In relation to GRID-Arendal’s long-standing and vital col-

laboration with UNEP, the key message from this report

is that the relationship is changing in a fundamental and

strategically important way. This change is most evident in

the type of engagement – from ad hoc, short assignments

concentrating on publication services, to long-term and

programmatic collaboration that involves inter alia ana-

lytical contributions and active outreach beyond launch.

This approach permits much greater synergies and scope

for innovation, as is made clear by the collaboration on

the most recent rendition of the

Global Environment

Outlook 5

, which combines substantive content from

GRID-Arendal with an extensive programme of “life after

launch” outreach activities. Manifestations of the trend

are also found in recent consultations on enhanced col-

laboration at the regional level, for instance in relation to

a strategic initiative to revamp the

Africa Environmental

Information Network (AEIN)

, and in the multiple joint

applications to the

Global Environment Facility (GEF)

,

which is key to building the future foundation for ‘pro-

grammatic’ (i.e. programme-led) collaboration between

the institutions.