Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  41 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 41 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

41

10.1.3 Expenditures versus funding 2010-11

In 2011, income was generated from 126 projects and/

or individual contracts, compared to 143 in 2010, reflect-

ing a strategy of rationalisation. As of 31 December 2011,

GRID-Arendal’s work programme encompassed 88 active

projects.

In 2010 a funding reserve of MNOK 7.4 was carried over

from the previous year and distributed as shown in Ta-

ble 3. The funding reserve is calculated as payments from

external sources less the cost of completed or committed

work, and thereby represents the balance of funds avail-

able for delivering committed activities under the work

programme. In 2011 GRID-Arendal’s funding reserve was

28% lower than the previous year (i.e. from MNOK 7.4 in

2010 to MNOK 5.3 in 2011).

85

Total project expenditures

for the period (MNOK 95.3) exceeded the available fund-

ing (MNOK 86.5) by 9%, or MNOK 8.8. This shortfall is

covered by a combination of the funding reserve and an

allocation from GRID-Arendal´s equity reserve.

As stated in the 2010 MoFA report, the entire project port-

folio over the period 2006-2010 was reconciled during

2010. Completed projects were closed and, where neces-

sary, losses were recorded. A total of MNOK 3.8 was real-

located from the GRID-Arendal accumulated surplus from

2009-2010 to cover the verified shortfall.

A subsequent internal financial audit covering a longer pe-

riod (2007-2011) confirmed that the funds applied to the

verified shortfall were generated on the basis of the finan-

cial results reported for the period 2007-2009. Further, the

audit revealed that a certain proportion of the financial re-

sults during this period were recorded in error, which has

resulted in a proportional write down of GRID-Arendal’s

equity (ref. external audit dated 7 February 2012 Annex 3).

PROGRAMME 2008-09 TO 2011 Transfer 2010

(MoFA report

2008-09)

Adjustment

Actual Funding

2010/2011

Expenditure

2010/2011

Variance

(transfer into

2012)

MARINE ENVIRONMENT: A.

UNEP Shelf Programme

-291

-4

19,945

19,859

-209

MARINE ENVIRONMENT: B.

Management of the Marine

Environment

1,250

311

12,245

13,745

60

MARINE ENVIRONMENT: C.

Data Management, Visualization

and Tools

133

7

4,222

4,362

0

POLAR AND CRYOSPHERE

3,382

1,331

17,324

22,401

-364

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS-

MENTS AND INFORMATION

2,361

1,888

32,202

33,789

2,661

OTHER PROJECTS

536

-37

568

1,101

-34

TOTAL

7,372

3,496

86,505

95,257

2,116

85. The largest reserves are in the Environmental Assessments and

Information Programme, where projects are either funded biennially,

start up is delayed and awaiting matching external funding, or funding

has been paid in advance but the project activities have not yet com-

menced.

86. For 2012 the financial situation is reported by four divisions: – Ma-

rine, Polar and Cryosphere, Capacity Building and Assessments, and

Communication and Outreach.

87. The largest projects with secured external funding are Himalayan

Climate Change Impact and Adaption Assessment (HICIA), Many

Strong Voices, Interpol, Fredskorpset, UArctic, Deep Sea Minerals, Cas-

pian Information Centre, UNEP MAP.

10.2

Budget 2012

86

10.2.1 Projected funding

The Board-approved funding budget of MNOK 58.1 for

2012, distributed by programme area, appears in Fig-

ure 6 below. Secured external funding (i.e. contracted)

totals approximately MNOK 14.0.

87

The budget includes

MNOK 4.5 MoE core funding, MNOK 20.0 MoFA funding,

MNOK 6.7 UNEP funding and MNOK 27.0 other external

funding. In the event MoFA funding of MNOK 20.0 and

core funding from MoE of MNOK 4.5 is secured for 2012,

three-quarters of the total projected funding required for

2012 activities will have been obtained.

Table 3: Expenditure versus funding 2010-2011 and impact on funding reserves (KNOK)