Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  37 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 37 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

37

played in Figure 3 and Table 1 below. Beyond the MoFA

funding of MNOK 42.2 and the core funding of MNOK 9.0

from the Ministry of Environment (MoE), GRID-Arendal

raised a total of MNOK 11.2 from UNEP and MNOK 24.1

from other external sources over the period, representing

41% of total funding.

Environmental Assessments and Information and Polar

and Cryosphere collectively raised a significant propor-

tion of leveraged (external) funding (UNEP and external

sources for these two areas totalled 54% of total fund-

ing). The corresponding ratio for the Marine Programme

is lower due to the stipulation that funding allocated to

the UNEP Shelf Programme may not be leveraged. Nev-

ertheless, external funding for the Marine Programme

increased by 65% between 2010 and 2011 (i.e. from

MNOK 3.1 to MNOK 5.1).

As Figure 3 shows, the external contribution decreased

from MNOK 12.4 in 2010 to MNOK 11.7 in 2011. UNEP

funding decreased by 28% from MNOK 6.5 in 2010 to

MNOK 4.7 in 2011, resulting in an overall decrease of

13% in external funding (or MNOK 2.5). However, the

slight decrease needs to be understood in the context

of the modified accounting principle described above

(e.g. MNOK 1.8 in UNEP funding contracted in 2011 is

recorded for 2012).

10.1

Programme funding

2010-2011

84

The accounting principles applied by GRID-Arendal have

been modified. Henceforth, funding related to projects

contracted (committed) in one year, but scheduled for

implementation in the following year, will now be re-

ported in the year of implementation. This is motivated

by the need to invoice and record for the same year, and

highlights the reality that many contracted projects re-

quire more time than originally anticipated to commence

implementation. Thus, MNOK 1.8 in UNEP funding se-

cured in 2011 for projects scheduled for implementation

in 2012, will be recorded in 2012. Corresponding funding

from external sources is calculated to MNOK 10.0. The

total funding profile is therefore significantly improved by

the end of 2011 compared to 2010. Projected funding for

the 2012 programme of work is robust.

The distributions of GRID-Arendal’s funding sources by

programme area during the period of 2010-2011 are dis-

10 Financial report

84. For 2010-2011 the financial situation is reported for three programmes:

Marine, Polar and Cryosphere, and Environmental Assessments and In-

formation. Allocations and expenditures for Communications and Out-

reach are included under Environmental Assessments and Information.

Figure 3: Actual 2010-11 funding by funding source (KNOK)