Previous Page  104 / 482 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 104 / 482 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

APRIL 1 9 89

wholly or mainly in direct marketing

or direct mailing, providing credit

references or collecting debts, as

well as any other data controllers

who keep "sensitive" personal

data, that is, data relating to racial

origin, political opinions, religious or

other beliefs, physical or mental

health, sexual life or criminal

convictions.

If the only kind of sensitive

personal health data kept by a data

controller is health data kept in the

ordinary course of personnel

administration and not used for any

other purpose, then he does not

have to register - unless of course

he comes under one of the other

categories that have to do so. This

exemption from registration,

therefore, will not apply if, for

example, a data controller has to

register by virtue of being a public

sector body required to do so.

Data processors whose business

consists wholly or partly in

processing personal data on behalf

of data controllers also have to

register.

Registration began on 9 January

and will continue up to 19 April

1989, when the remaining pro-

visions of the Act, with one or two

exceptions, will come into force.

Thereafter, any registrable person

who has not registered will commit

an offence while those who have

registered will commit an offence

if they knowingly deal with data

otherwise than as indicated in their

registered entry. Registration is

subject to an annual fee of £100.

Data controllers most likely to

keep personal data relating to

physical or mental health will

include hospitals, nursing homes,

clinics, doctors, dentists, phar-

macists and insurance companies.

Schools, colleges, educational

establishments,

barristers

and

solicitors may a/so have to register

by virtue

of their

keeping

"sensitive" personal information,

as

defined above, on computer.

Enforcement of the Act is the

responsibility, in the first instance,

of the Commissioner, who is ap-

pointed by the Government and is

independent in the exercise of his

functions. Appeals against his

decisions lie to the Circuit Court.

He is required to investigate

complaints that the data protection

provisions have been contravened

and may do so also on his own

initiative. If he is satisfied that a

breach has occurred he can issue

an "enforcement notice" on the

data controller or data processor

concerned indicating what must be

done to comply with the Act. A

refusal or failure to comply with

such a notice, without reasonable

excgse, is an offence.

The Commissioner can prohibit

the transfer of personal data

outside the jurisdiction in certain

cases. He does this through the

issue of a "prohibition notice". The

provisions in the Act relating to the

transfer of data correspond to

those in Article 12 of the

Convention. When applying them,

the Commissioner must balance

the interest of privacy against the

desirability of facilitating inter-

national transfers of data. Failure to

comply with a prohibition notice

without reasonable excuse is also

an offence.

The Data Protection Act creates

a new branch of the law having its

own particular concepts and terms.

As stated, it will come into

operation on 19 April 1989. To

assist those affected by it a Guide

to the Act, registration forms and

guidance notes on how to

complete them are available, on

request, from the Office of the

Commissioner, 74 St. Stephen's

Green, Dublin 2. Tel. 01-789304.

It is to be hoped that all those

immediately involved with imple-

menting the Act and its require-

ments will co-operate to make it a

success. It is the first privacy

legislation to have been enacted by

the Oireachtas and the advantages

that can stem from it for data

subjects, data controllers and data

processors are considerable, both

on the domestic and on the

international plane. On the

domestic plane, it establishes new

individual rights and introduces

new standards of data protection

that will make for increased

efficiency and cost saving in the

management of computer systems,

while on the international plane it

has placed this country in the

forefront of modern data protection

legislation, a factor that can only

benefit our international trade and

business life, particularly in the

information market.

FORENSIC

F A B L E S

by

o

THE GREAT LAWYER WHO TOLD HIS

AUDIENCE HOW TO DO IT

A

G R E AT Lawyer Once Attended a Banquet.

He was the Principal Guest. The Great

Lawyer's Hosts were Budding Members of the

Bar who had Formed a Debating Society. They

Desired to Pay Honour where Honour was Due and

to Learn from One who had Arrived at the Top how

the Trick was to be Done. The Great Lawyer, when

Responding to the Toast of the Evening, Told them

All About It. Individual Effort and Concentration,

said the Great Lawyer, were the Only Things that

Counted. There were Some, he Believed, who

Thought that Luck was an Important Factor in Life.

They were Wrong. He who Wished to Succeed must

Work—Work—Work. He must Rise Early and

Map Out his Day. He must be an Athlete in Strict

Training. He must be a Sentry at his Post, Morning,

Noon and Night. He must Serve One Master, and

One Master Only—his Profession. The Great

Lawyer Reminded them of the Emperor Napoleon's

Observations on the Subject of Knapsacks and

Batons, and Assured them that, if Only they would

Fight the Good Fight, Each One of them might be a

Marshal in the Army of the Law. And in a Moving

Peroration the Great Lawyer Attributed his Own

Success in Life to a Strict Adherence to the Maxims

he was Expounding. In Point of Fact, the Great

I.awver had been Spoon-Fed by a Near Relative from

the Day of his Call; he had Always Taken Things

Easily and Done himself Well; he had made a

Matrimonial Alliance which Furnished him with

Abundant Cash; a Series of Unexpected Political

Events had Floated him into a Government; and the

Sudden Demise of an Important Personage on the

Eve of his Party's Defeat at the Polls had Provided

him with the Fat Job which he now Enjoyed. When

the Great Lawyer Resumed his seat after Speaking for

Forty-Five Minutes, his Innocent Hosts Cheered him

to the Echo, and Went Home Grimly Determined to

Follow in the Great Lawyer's Footsteps.

Moral.—w

the Right Thing.

Reproduced with the permission of

Butterworth Law Publishers Ltd. from

Forensic Fables by O:

complete edition

available from Butterworth (Ireland) Ltd.,

9 D'Olier Street, Dublin 2.

9 0