Previous Page  305 / 482 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 305 / 482 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

SEPTEMBER

1989

Interview wi th

Thomas O'Higgins

Judge, Court of Justice of the European Communities

The following is the text of an

interview with the Hon. Mr. Justice

Thomas O'Higgins, Judge, Court of

Jus t i ce

of

the

European

Communities which was published

in a book entitled

Judging the

World: Law and Politics in the

World's leading Courts

by Gary

Sturgess and Philip Chubb,

published by Butterworths in 1988.

It is reprinted with kind permission

of the publishers.

Interviewer:

As somebody who

was President of a national court,

you would have some appreciation

of how national courts feel having

a super-national body sitting above

them!

Thomas O'Higgins:

I do not think

it is looked at exactly in that way.

The Supreme Court in Ireland is the

highest court in Ireland and I should

imagine the House of Lords in

England regards itself still as the

highest court in England. It is not

that the Court of Justice here

mon i t o rs or supervises the

decisions of the national courts -

in fact it doesn't. Under article 177,

it operates merely to ensure that

there is a uniformity of interpre-

tation of the Treaty and the

regulations of Community law. It is

the reference system under which

a national court operates once it

feels that an interpretation of a

regulation, or directive, or piece of

Community law is necessary for its

decision. It refers the question of

interpretation to us, we give the

interpretation, and the national

court proceeds with its job of

deciding the case.

So you don't feel that the national

courts are jealously guarding their

preserve against the operation of

this court?

No, quite the contrary. The

remarkable thing has been the

generous co-operation by the

national jurisdictions and the

functioning of the Treaty and of

article 177. Were it not for that

generous co-operation, there could

not have been the remarkable

development of community law

and of trust and understanding in

the Community itself that has

taken place in the last two decades.

Could

you talk

about

the

relationship between the political

arms of the Community institutions

and the court?

Well, it is really hard to apply these

terms to what is, after all, an

organistaion in a very formative

state - I am talking about Europe.

The political arm I suppose would

be the parliament. We do not have

any relations or connections with

the parliament. The executive, in

the sense of the permanent

controlling party, is the Commis-

sion and the Commission is a

continual litigant here before the

court, bringing proceedings to

enforce the Treaty against different

countries and so on. Sometimes it

succeeds, sometimes not. But the

court must maintain an absolutely

rigid independence amongst the

European institutions. If it did not

do so it could not function and the

fact that it has functioned and has,

if I may say so, such high standing

and respect in Europe indicates

how successfully it has maintained

its independence.

How political is the process of

appointment to the court?

Appointments to the court are

made on the nomination of a

member state. The nominee must

be endorsed by all the other states.

It is not essential or necessary that

a member state nominates one of

its own nationals. A member state

could nominate a national of any

country, although I am bound to

say it has not occurred. The

requirement is that it should be a

person who is a judge of the

highest standing or have equal

qualifications. So far as I know,

nominations to this court have

always been of people of the

necessary qualifications and it will

always continue to be so.

You have had a life in politics as

well as in law. You were elected to

the DaiI Eireann, you were a

Minister for Health, and you twice

contested the Presidency. In your

judicial career, have you found it

difficult to divorce yourself from

your politics?

No, I have not found it difficult. It

is quite extraordinary that when

you become a judge you take an

oath and become very objective.

You have an issue to be decided

and you never consider who is on

either side of that issue. You decide

what has to be decided. I have

never felt the slightest difficulty in

operating as a judge, even though

I have been active in politics and led

an active political life.

Did you find nevertheless that people

who had been closely associated

with you in politics did not respect

your independence as you did?

No, I have never had that experi-

The Hon. Mr. Justice Thomas

O'Higgins.

283