Previous Page  321 / 482 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 321 / 482 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

SEPTEMBER 1989

Viewpoint 299

Safety, Health & Welfare

at Work Act, 1989

301

President's Column

308

Practice Notes 313 People & Places 316

Service of Documents

by Fax

318

Capital Acquisitions Tax

and the Favourite

Nephew Relief

321

Compensation Fund held

liable to Bank on basis of

Fraudulent Undertaking 327

Younger Members News 329 Correspondence 331

Professional Information

333

*

Executive Editor:

Mary Gaynor

Committee:

Geraldine Clarke, Chairman

Eamonn G. Hall, Vice-Chairman

John F. Buckley

Gary Byrne

Patrick McMahon

Charles R. M. Meredith

Daire Murphy

John Schutte

Advertising:

Seán Ó hOisín. Telephone: 305236

307860

Printing:

Turner's Printing Co. Ltd., Longford.

*

The views expressed in this publication,

save where otherwise indicated, are the

views of the contributors and not

necessarily the views of the Council of

the Society.

The appearance of an advertisement in

this publication does not necessarily

indicate approval by the Society for the

product or service advertised.

Published at Blackhall Place, Dublin 7.

Tel.: 710711. Telex: 31219.

Fax: 710704.

GAZETT

INCORPORATE D

LAW SOCIETY

OF IRELAND

Vol. 83 No. 9 Septembe r 1389

Viewpoint

The Judicial Separation and Family

Law Reform Act 1989 comes into

operation on the 19th October

next. This is the first Private

Member's Bill to become law for

three decades and history will

show it to be a very significant

piece of legislation wi th implica-

tions for society in general as well

as the profession.

The practice of Family Law has

unfortunately not been a priority

within the profession, with those

that do practise in this area not

always regarded as "real lawyers".

The statistics however, show that

marital breakdown is on the in-

crease and the legal implications of

such breakdown on property, in-

come and capital, on wills and

probate are extensive. The pro-

fession must be able to meet the

needs of those who find them-

selves in this situation and must in

particular familiarise themselves

with the provisions of the new Act.

The Judicial Separation Act now

places a responsibility on any

solicitor acting for either the

applicant or the respondent to

discuss with them the possibility of

reconciliation, the process of

mediation and the advantages of

concluding matters by Deed of

Separation and certify to the court

that such discussion has taken

place. In the case of reconciliation

and mediation, a list of qualified

persons or agencies must also be

furnished. The question is - are

such persons and agencies freely

available? Marriage counselling

services are run mainly by volun-

tary groups wi th the help of some

government funding. The Pilot

Scheme on Family Mediation which

completed its three year pro-

gramme in July last only received

a committment to continuation of

its service during the election

campaign. There are only limited

s t a t u t o ry based se r v i ces

for

families

in crisis

despite the

elevated position of the family in

the Constitution. Further resources

are required.

The grounds for application to

the court for a decree of judicial

separation have been broadened to

include not only adultery and

cruelty (or unreasonable behaviour)

but also desertion and separation

(with and without consent for one

or three years respectively) and

finally where the marriage has

broken down to such an extent that

a "normal marital relationship" has

not existed for one year prior to the

application. "Normal marital re-

lationship" is, of course not defined

in the Act and will make for in-

teresting judicial interpretation!

This ground is designed to cover a

marriage which has irretrievably

broken down and/or where a couple

are separated in all respects except

that they continue to reside in the

same house.

The power of the court to make

ancilliary financial, property, cus-

tody and other orders is now very

extensive and will cover areas of

property, succession and trusts.

The court can award periodical

payments (both secured and un-

secured) for maintenance. It can

make

lump sum orders

in addition

to periodical payments. It can also

make property adjustment orders

which include ordering transfers of

property, placing property in settle-

ment, varying the entitlement of

spouses under existing settlements

and extinguishing or reducing such

entitlements. The extinguishment

of succession rights is left to the

discretion of the court to decide at

the time of granting the decree or

at any time thereafter.

Contd. on page 3J5.

299