Previous Page  337 / 482 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 337 / 482 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE.

SEPTEMBER 1989

Objections &

Requisitions on Title

1989 (Revised)

Edition.

The 1989 Revised Edition of the

Objections and Requisitions on

Title contain a number of changes

some of which relate to the

wording or location of specific

Requisitions without any change in

substance. The

subs t an t i ve

changes made are as follows:

Roads in Charge - Requis. 2 .9 -

This has been amended in line

with the recent Conveyancing

Committee recommendation

that a Solicitors Certificate of

the position concerning the

taking in charge of Roads and

Services be accepted, based on

his inspection of the Local

Au t ho r i ty Records or his

personal knowledge.

Water & Refuse Charges -

Requis. 10.6

- This has been

amended to elicit details of

Water and Refuse Charges

which although not currrently

payable in respect of Premises

were previously payable and

may be outstanding. This in

conjunction with Requis. 10. 8

requires the Vendor to produce

a receipt for such charges up to

the last Accountable Date.

Land Act 1965 - Requis 17.1 -

The words "if the property is not

situate as aforesaid" have been

inserted after Requis. 17.1. If the

answer to 17.1 is in the affirma-

tive then the remainder of this

requisition need not be answered.

Exemp t ed Deve l opmen ts -

Requisition 25.1

- A specific

reference to an Exempted

Development has been added to

emphasize t hat the Query

relates to all Development

whether exempted or not.

New Flats - Expenditure on

qualifying premises - Requis.

2 9 . 32

- This Requisition has

been extended to identify the

relevant period during which the

expenditure was incurred. This

information being required for

the purpose of claiming the

appropriate Relief.

A number of Requisitions have

been laid out and positioned in

such a manner as to make them

easily detachable if they are not

relevant or for use as pre

Contract enquiries.

THE TAXES ACTS

The Eleventh supplement to the loose-leaf volumes

"The Taxes Acts" has now been published. The supplement

embodies the amendments made by the Finance Act, 1988.

Copies of the supplement may be purchased from the

Government Publications Sales Office,

Sun Alliance House, Molesworth Street, Dublin 2.

Price £7.50 (postage extra)

Revenue Commissioners. Dublin Castle.

AIJA

2nd, 3rd, 4th NOVEMBER, 1989

at

WYNDERMERE

I N T RODUC T I ON TO ENGL I SH BUS I NESS LAW

Anybody interested, please contact:

MI CHAEL IRVINE,

Matheson Ormsby Prentice,

3 Burlington Road, Dublin 4.

Tel: (01) 760981

Fax: (01) 760501

Telex: 93310

VIEWPOINT

Contd. from page 299.

The scope of the legislation is

very extensive and on every reading

some new point or consideration

can be found. One section which

could cause a repeat of the

conveyancing nightmare of the

Family Home Protection Act or

worse is the provision for

voidance

of certain transactions.

The court

may if it is satisfied that a spouse

to proceedings has or is about to

make a

disposition

of

any

property,

(which will have the effect of

defeating a claim for financial relief)

can set aside the disposition or re-

strain the spouse from so dispos-

ing. Any such disposition is a

"reviewable disposition" unless it

was made for valuable considera-

tion to a person who acted in good

faith and without notice of any

intention to defeat a claim for

financial relief. Where the dis-

position takes place within three

years and has the consequence of

defeating an applicant's claim for

financial relief the intention to

defeat will be presumed unless the

contrary is shown.

The Act also provides that the

High Court and Circuit Family Court

will have jurisdiction to hear appli-

cations for judicial separation.

Furthermore

all

proceedings in the

courts must be heard in as informal

a manner as possible and neither

judges nor barristers shall wear

wigs and gowns. This should also

have significant implications for the

profession. Although solicitors have

had a right of audience in the

Superior Courts for some time this

right has only been exercised in-

frequently. Now that the deterrent

of distinction of dress is gone more

of us should be encouraged to

acquire the specialised advocacy

skills necessary to present our

clients case to the courts.

A discussion on the provisions of

the Act will follow in a future issue

of the

Gazette.

315