GAZETTE
DECEMBER 1989
prudence. The comprehensive and
balanced analysis afforded to ad-
ministrative law issues in the
Annual Review
is also to be found
in the other chapters of the Review.
Disraeli noted that " so sweet
was the delight of study". Selden
wrote that "patience was chiefest
fruit of study". Nevertheless, we
need not assume that the 470
pages of text in the
Annual Review
were achieved without effort on
the part of the authors. It has truly
been stated that there never was a
great book that did not cost un-
speakable labour. Your reviewer and
many practitioners were greatly
assisted in their professional en-
deavours by the fruits of the
research carried out by Raymond
Byrne and William Binchy as
manifested in the
Annual Review
1987.
The task of professional legal
advisers will continue to be made
easier with the
Annual Review
1988.
Finally, your reviewer noted in
this
Gazette
in relation to last year's
Annual Review
that Raymond
Byrne and William Binchy had
examined 'an avalanche of judicial
opinions and legislative enact-
ments', had 'succeeded in separ-
ating the gold from the alloy in the
coinage of the law and had
admirably distilled the notable
features of that law within the
confines of their
Annual Review'.
It
was stated that the Round Hall
Press expected the 1987 Review to
be the first of a series; 'a new Irish
institution had been inaugurated'.
Your reviewer is glad to report that
the new Irish institution in the form
of the
Annual Review 1988
is flour-
ishing. Raymond Byrne and William
Binchy have produced a vade-
mecum which judges, legal pract-
itioners, academics and students
should cherish.
Eamonn G. Hall
VALUATION OF PROPERTY
FOR RATING PURPOSES
Valuation Office, October 1989
The Valuation Office has recently
published a handy, if somewhat
cursory, guide to the underlying
legislation and the practical pro-
cedures currently associated with
the Irish rating system.
The principal statutory enact-
ments are listed and the effect of
certain provisions loosely des-
cribed. Sadly, the booklet fails to
answer one of the fundamental
questions that has bothered your
reviewer throughout the whole of
his professional career - namely,
how on earth are rateable valua-
tions arrived at? Paragraph 8 pur-
ports to describe the "basis of
valuation" but, beyond a some-
what vague exclamation of "net
annual value", falls far short of real
enlightenment; the word "eureka"
is noticeably absent from one's
spontaneous reactions.
One may be glad to hear - or
one may not, as the case may be
- that the Act of 1988 provides for
"continuous revision" to replace
the hitherto intended "annual
cycle" for revision of the Valuation
Lists, with effect from 1st February,
1989. Section 3 of that Act em-
powers an owner or occupier of
property, or the rating authority or
the Valuation Office to apply
at any
time
for a revision of valuation, and
prescribes the appropriate proced-
ures for determination of all such
applications.
Perhaps the most useful part of
this booklet is its description of the
procedures whereby an owner or
occupier may appeal against a
revision of valuation, in the first
instance, to the Commissioner of
Valuation and, in the second in-
stance, the Valuation Tribunal - a
new statutory animal born of the
1988 Act.
Charles R .M. Meredith
LAW REFORM COMM I SS I ON
REPORT ON LAND LAW AND
CONVEYANCING LAW
(1) General Proposals CRC 30-1989.
IRE5.00
INTRODUCTION
The Law Reform Commission has
just published its first Report on
Land and Conveyancing Law*. The
background to this Report is that
the Attorney General requested the
Law Reform Commission in 1987 to
look at the reform of "conveyancing
law and practice in areas where this
could lead to savings for house pur-
chasers". The resulting Report
makes a number of useful proposals
which might lead to some small
savings for house purchasers but,
on balance, the Report does not
achieve to any significant extent the
aim set for it by the Attorney
General. For the most part, this
Report only recommends changes
in the law which would remove
anomalies or redundant provisions
of a somewhat technical nature and
does not recommend major sub-
stantive changes. It may well be
that the intention of the Com-
mission is to deal with more sub-
stantial proposals in its later reports
on the issue of conveyancing law
generally. It is hoped that the
Commission will rise to the chall-
enge of proposing reforms in an
area of the law which is so much in
need of the reforming hand of the
Oireachtas.
SIMPLIFYING AND
MODERNISING CONVEYANCING
The First Part of the Report is
devoted to possible changes which
would simplify and modernise
conveyancing.
Title Period
The Commission looked at the
Statutory Period of Title in open
contracts. Section 1 of the Vendor
and Purchaser Act 1874 provides
that the vendor must trace back his
title for 40 years. The Commission
recommends that the term for
which title must be shown under
the Vendor & Purchaser Act 1874
be reduced from 40 to 20 years.
This is a sensible proposal though
of limited application.
Partial Merger
In order to avoid any doubts which
might arise in the future, the Com-
mission recommends that a person,
who is entitled to a leasehold
interest in a portion only or property
held under a lease and actually
acquires any superior interest in that
property, be legally entitled, if he so
wished, to merge the leasehold
interest in the next of all superior
interests held by him.
Fee Tail
In spite of suggestions that the fee
tail estate be abolished, the Com-
mission recommends its retention
but that it be registered at the
Registry of Deeds or the Land
Registry (as appropriate) instead of
the High Court as at present.
Partition
Following the doubts arising from
the
O'D -v- O'D
(1983) and
FF-v- CF
(1985) decisions in the High Court,
the Commission recommends that,
to resolve the matter, a statutory
provision should be enacted
4 48