GAZETTE
FEBRUARY 1989
Advice on Investments
There is no simple, all embracing answer to that most popular
of questions "whe re should I put this money". Indeed before
attempting to answer any financial advisor worth his salt will
need to spend some t ime asking a lot of questions in return.
Does the investor need an income: does he or she need ready
access to the funds: what is his or her tax situation: what
is the attitude to risk: and even, is there any worry about the
t ax -man asking where the money came from?
There are no black and white
answers to most of these
questions. There are degrees of risk
aversion. There may be no need for
ready access to the money -
except an emergency arising. A
good financial advisor needs to
know his client and his or her
circumstances - one reason
indeed why solicitors can have an
advantage in this area. The advisor,
of course, also needs to have a
broad notion of the type of outlets
available. It is then a matter of
fitting the client to the investment
outlet.
There is a growing range of
investment possibilities - new
products being developed by the
increasingly competitive financial
services sector and the new found
option of investing abroad with the
easing of exchange controls. It
would take a book - even a few
books - to cover them all
adequately. For the purposes of this
article let us look at three make-
believe clients and some of the
investment options which might
suit them.
Client 1
- Mr X is self-employed
with a good income. He pays heavy
tax but has some spare funds
which are not needed in the
business. He does not need to
supplement his income and can
leave the money untouched for the
foreseeable future - certainly
some years. As a businessman he
is not adverse to risk.
The range of options here are
immense. But let us suppose that
Mr X wants something more
exciting than putting his money on
deposit with a bank, building
society or the Post Office and that
direct stock exchange investment
does not appeal to him. But he
would like the idea of something
"tax effective". Let us have a look
at some of the options.
Pension Scheme: if he has not
already set up a personal pension
scheme, then he should do so
without delay. He will get full tax
relief on annual contributions of up
to 15 pc of his income and will also
benefit from the fact that the
money in the pension fund builds
up free of tax. It can, in fact, be
by C o lm Rapp le
worth while to put in even more
than 15 pc of income for that
reason.
If Mr X is an employee of his own
company, the tax relief possibil-
ities are far greater since the
company can claim tax relief on all
its contributions provided the
scheme does not promise more
than the maximum benefits
approved by the Revenue
Commissioners. And they are very
generous.
Business Expansion Scheme: An
earlier article in this series looked
at the opportunities for setting up
businesses in the tourism sector
under this scheme. Any individual
can get tax relief on up to £25,000
a year invested in such a project. Of
course, the scheme also applies to
manufacturing ventures and stock-
brokers often have entrepreneurs
on their books looking for funds.
There are also funds which seek
investment from time to time and
spread the funds over a range of
ventures.
But be careful, the tax advantage
can often be largely offset by profit
sharing and share option schemes
which the promoters build-in for
their benefit. And there may be no
clear means of realising the
investment in the future.
Section 23 Apartment or House:
For someone with cash to invest for
at least ten years the purchase of
a new apartment or house for
renting can be a very attractive
proposition. Provided it falls into the
Section 23 guidelines, the rental
income can be collected tax free
until the purchaser recoups the
cost of the building in full. The cost
of the building can be reckoned to
be about 70 to 80 pc of the price
paid. The letting has to be to a non-
connected tenant for at least ten
years. Good conversions also
comply with the rules. Better still
the tax relief can be immediately
set against other rental income if
the client has any.
Unit Linked Funds: Since Mr X
does not want to invest directly in
company shares either at home or
abroad, a unit linked fund may be
an alternative. The entry cost is
higher than buying shares directly
but there is the benefit of
professional management of the
fund and the knowledge that the
investment is a spread of shares or
properties or whatever.
A unit linked fund is basically a
co-op of investors who pool their
money under the aegis of some
insurance company which provides
the professional management.
About 8 pc of the investment goes
in buying in. There is a 3 pc stamp
duty and there is usually a 5 pc
spread between the price at which
the units are bought and the price
at which they are sold. So someone
who cashed in their investment
immediately after making it would
lose 8 pc of their money.
Those funds which do not have
a 5 pc price spread usually impose
heavier annual management costs
and early encashment penalties.
Unit values - like shares - can
go up and down. Some perform
better than others. Some carry less
risk than others. The choice is wide.
Quarterly surveys of fund
performances are published in
some of the daily papers and can
provide a guide to future prospects.
Past performance is not always a
57