GAZETTE
FEBRUARY 1989
majority of pre- 1922 Statutes -
these cannot be obtained in the
Government Stationery Office.
Due to the inactivity of succes-
sive Governments many of the
main Statutes governing criminal
law fall into that category. The
Vagrancy Act 1824, The Offences
against the Person Act 1861, The
Dublin Police Act 1842, The
Childrens Act 1908 and the
Larceny Act 1916 are cases in
point. On several occasions I have
witnessed legal argument in
Court in relation to these Acts
falter and end as the Act in
question was not readily available
even in the Court offices.
The Round Hall Press have
commenced a series of books
called Irish Statutes Annotated
which may rectify the problem to
some extent. The first book in the
series, "The Larceny Act, 1916",
contains the full text of that Act
together with all subsequent
amendments. Also included is an
introduction to the Act, a full case
index, a commentary on the
various Sections of the Act and
finally some thoughts on reform.
This introduction deals with the
whole concept of larceny as a
crime against possession as
opposed to ownership and the
difficulties the law has had in
reconciling that concept with
various dishonest actions which
deprive persons of their goods but
which do not amount to the crime
of larceny. Indeed some of the
illogical and peculiar English
decisions are judicial attempts to
criminalise obviously dishonest
behaviour which does not come
within the framework of the Act.
It also discusses at length the
difficult problem of "Possession"
in law which has also given rise
to irreconcilable judicial judgements.
The commentary on the Act
itself is informative and easily
readable though uneven in places.
Because the Act is so old many
of the Sections now are otiose
and in some cases almost
certainly unconstitutional. I would
have liked a greater discussion of
the unconstitutional aspects of
the Act though the Author does
point out several sub-sections
such as s.43 (1) - (Prosecution
empowered to put previous con-
victions of accused in evidence
(and s.42 (2) (Chief Officer
authorising searches) which are
almost certainly unconstitutional.
However, no comment is made in
relation to s.37 (6) which author-
ises the sentence of whipping
(maximum sentence 50 strokes).
The final part of the Book is a
readable discussion of possible
reforms to the larceny code. The
Theft Act was introduced in 1968
in England but many problems
have remained unsolved. One
difficulty is that the very structure
of the State is partly built on
dishonesty and unfairness. A
Statute that attacked all forms of
dishonesty would therefore be an
attack on the State itself as it now
exists. Abuse of monopoly power,
insider trading, misuse of the
protection given to corporate
entities can all be said to be
dishonest but not criminal and yet
can cause more harm to the
public than petty theft. Whatever
one feels about this there can be
no doubt that the Act is in need
of reform. Many of its Sections
are outdated, unconstitutional
and even morally objectionable.
The Irish Statutes Annotated
series is to be welcomed as a
necessary innovation in legal
publishing. I am delighted that the
series commenced with this Act.
The second book in the series will
deal with the Civil Liability Act
1961. For the reasons outlined
earlier I would ask the Editor to
annotate as many pre-1922
Statutes as possible. I would also
hope that the subsequent books
would keep up the same standard
as this one. Despite the fact that
the Book deals with a technical
subject it is readable and
interesting and contains very few
errors. I would recommend it to
any lawyer who appears regularly
before our Criminal Courts. In fact
those lawyers who do not appear
before our Courts should read it
also - every man is presumed to
know the law after all.
Mi chael Staines
DOCUMENT
EXAMINATION
LEGAL AID
CASES
UNDERTAKEN
M . Anse l l, M . A . ,
9 8 The B r oadwa y,
H e me Bay,
Kent C T 6 8EY,
Eng l and
Tel. (03 02273) 6 7 9 29 (24 Hours)
Solicitors
ARE YOU HAVING
DIFFICULTY
LOCATING SPECIALIST/
TECHNICAL WITNESSES?
If so please let us help you.
Contact:
M.D.Nelson Ltd.
Sandfield, Ennis, Co. Clare.
Telephone: 065 28116
Solicitors - How Public are
your Private Conversations?
For reasons beyond our control, our
telephone system has been out of
order.
For details of our electronic
soundproofing systems, you can
contact us at our new phone
number 376135
Soundmasking Ltd.
25, Harcourt Street, Dublin 2. Tel: 376135
67