Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  101 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 101 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

Descriptive statistics,

x

2

test, and two-sided

t

test with

unequal variances were performed. A

p

value

<

0.05 was

significant.

RESULTS

Six thousand four hundred fifty-three patients were

observed during the study time period. The prevalence of

migraine, tinnitus, and migraine with tinnitus is reported

in the figure. All 521 tinnitus patients were reviewed and

20.9% reported PT with a PT prevalence of 1.7% among

all patients. After excluding migraine patients with

potential objective tinnitus (n

¼

36), significantly more

migrainers reported history of any tinnitus as compared

with nonmigrainers (9.3% versus 7.0%,

p

¼

0.007). Of

those with tinnitus, the percentage reporting PT

migrainers as compared with nonmigrainers was the

same (20.2% versus 18.1%,

p

¼

0.62). The prevalence

of PT among all migrainers was 1.9%.

Of the 145 patients with migraine and tinnitus, 129

were excluded (Fig. 1). The remaining 16 were assessed

for PT improvement with migraine treatment. Average

age was 45.4 years (range, 31.8–55.2), follow-up was

351 days (64–1,366 days). Fourteen out of 16 were

white. Seven out of 16 described the PT as episodic

whereas 4 reported constant PT. Eleven of the 16 patients

reported improvement in PT with migraine treatment.

There were no differences in demographics, sensorineu-

ral hearing loss, quality, or laterality of tinnitus between

those who improved and those who did not.

All patients were recommended the diet. In addition to

diet, seven patients were prescribed antimigraine medi-

cations. Decision to start a medication, type, and dosing

varied by patient history and side effect profile. Table 1

FIG. 1.

Flow of patients with prevalence of migraine and tinnitus.

PREVALENCE OF PULSATILE TINNITUS

Otology & Neurotology, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2016

80