Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  105 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 105 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

more recent reports have documented

Pseudomonas

infection

less frequently, with

Pseudomonas

cultured in as few as 27%

to 54% of cases.

5-7

Given the increasing frequency of nonpseudomonal

MOE, we decided to retrospectively review our clinical

experience with MOE and specifically compare clinical pre-

sentations, management, and outcomes of this infection

between cases caused by

Pseudomonas

and MRSA. We

hypothesized that the clinical presentation would be similar,

regardless of the causative organism, and that treatment

might be prolonged when caused by MRSA or other non-

Pseudomonas

organisms.

Methods

Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retro-

spective study (University of Pittsburgh institutional review

board approval #PRO12010268, principal investigator Andrew

A. McCall). The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Department of Otolaryngology clinical record database was

searched for all patients diagnosed with MOE between 1995

and 2012. Diagnosis was confirmed by the documented pres-

ence of the all of the obligatory Cohen criteria with 2 modifi-

cations.

10

First, it is generally our practice to obtain computed

tomographic (CT) scans in lieu of nuclear medicine studies to

confirm the presence of MOE.

11

We therefore included

patients with documented evidence of bony erosion on CT

scans in place of the obligatory Cohen criterion of either posi-

tive results on a technetium-99 scan or failure of local therapy.

Second, because of the retrospective nature of the study, in

some cases, not all of the obligatory clinical criteria were

documented for each patient. We accepted patients into the

present cohort who were missing documentation of no more

than 1 of the clinical signs or symptoms of the obligatory

Cohen criteria, as has been done by others.

12

Resolution of

infection was based on the absence of clinical signs or symp-

toms of disease and the absence of radiographic progression of

disease after a minimum follow-up period of 1 month after the

completion of antibiotic therapy. Microsoft Excel 2011

(Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington) and GraphPad

Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California) were

used for data management and statistical analysis. Statistical

comparisons between groups were performed using Fisher’s

exact test and Student’s

t

test as appropriate, and statistical sig-

nificance was set at

P

\

.05.

Results

Demographics

Twenty patients were identified from the database with sup-

porting documentation that permitted confirmation of the

diagnosis of MOE. The mean age at diagnosis was 65 years

for all patients, 62 years for

Pseudomonas

-infected patients,

and 63 years for MRSA-infected patients. There were 12

men and 8 women (

Table 1

).

Culture Data

Culture and sensitivity data were documented for all 20

patients. The means of obtaining culture data and therapy

prior to culture are documented in

Table 2

. There were 9

patients (45%) whose cultures grew

P aeruginosa

. There

was no documented ciprofloxacin resistance in any of the

Pseudomonas

specimens; 1

Pseudomonas

isolate was resis-

tant to levofloxacin. Two patients had cultures that grew

methicillin-sensitive

S aureus

in addition to

Pseudomonas

.

Three patients (15%) had cultures that grew MRSA in the

absence of

Pseudomonas

. One patient infected with MRSA

also grew

Klebsiella

and another grew pan-resistant

Acinetobacter

spp. One MRSA isolate was resistant to clin-

damycin; there was no documented resistance to doxycy-

cline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or vancomycin.

In the 5 remaining patients with positive cultures, the fol-

lowing organisms were documented (often in a polymicro-

bial fashion):

Enterococcus

spp (n = 2), methicillin-

sensitive

S aureus

(n = 1),

Candida

spp (n = 1),

Aspergillus

(n = 1),

Staphylococcus lugdunensis

(n = 1),

Lactobacillus

(n = 1),

Peptostreptococcus

(n = 1), and

Alcaligenes faecalis

(n = 1). Three patients had negative cultures.

Cranial Neuropathies

Thirty-three percent of the

Pseudomonas

-infected patients

presented with facial nerve palsies, compared with none of

Table 1.

Pathogens and Clinical Features.

All Patients

Pseudomonas

MRSA

Other

Negative

Clinical Feature

(n = 20)

(n = 9)

(n = 3)

(n = 5)

(n = 3)

Percentage of patients

100

45

15

25

15

Average age (y)

64.9

62.3

63.0

65.0

74.3

Age range (y)

42-100

42-77

44-100

52-79

61-84

Diabetes mellitus

75%

100.0%

33.3%

80.0%

33.3%

Facial nerve palsy

25%

33.3%

0%

20%

33.3%

Bony erosion (on CT scan)

95%

100%

100%

100%

66.7%

Failed local treatment

80%

66.7%

100%

80%

100%

Definitive therapy (wk)

7.8

6.1

8.5

11.8

6.7

Total therapy (wk)

9.2

7.9

12.6

12.0

6.7

Abbreviations: CT, computed tomographic; MRSA, methicillin-resistant

Staphylococcus aureus

.

Hobson et al

84