Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  72 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 72 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

Vestibular neurectomy via middle fossa approach

was performed in one patient to control intractable ver-

tigo, even after successful ablation of vestibular function

on a caloric test (canal paresis: 89%) with five rounds of

intratympanic gentamicin injections. The hearing of the

52-year-old woman after ITG was still acceptable (36.25

dB of pure tone average, with 82% for speech discrimi-

nation in the audiometry taken on a day prior to the

surgery). After surgery, complete control of vertigo (class

A) was achieved and hearing threshold was 35 dB after

surgery. However, the hearing was progressively wors-

ened to 55 dB after 1 year 6 months postoperatively,

which was comparable with the worst hearing (53.75

dB) during 6 months prior to the surgery.

Hearing Outcomes

Overall, there was no significant change in hearing

thresholds with the mean pure tone average 59.7 dB

prior to ITG and 63.2 dB after ITG (

P

5

0.343, Student’s

t-test). In total, 80 (84.2%) patients showed less than 10

dB change in hearing after ITG; hearing was improved

more than 10 dB even after ITG in six (6.3%) patients;

and three of them improved by more than 20 dB. Five of

the six patients with hearing improvement achieved suc-

cessful ablation of vestibular function on bithermal

caloric test, and all of them did not show hearing fluctu-

ation thereafter. In contrast, a patient with initially

impaired vestibular reflex showed fluctuation of hearing

with temporary hearing improvement at the point of

assessment according to the 1995 AAO–HNS guideline.

Two of the six patients experienced hearing aggravation

in the proximity of the ITG, with the worsening of ver-

tigo including the patient with hearing fluctuation. A

total of eight (8.4%) patients experienced more than a 10

dB worsening of hearing levels. Four of the eight

patients received more than three rounds of ITG; and

2.6 injections were applied, on average, in the eight

patients. However, a careful review of the data revealed

that most hearing loss took place after one (4 patients)

or two (2 patients) injection(s), and only two patients

experienced hearing loss after three injections. We com-

pared the results of hearing changes with the success of

ablation and the preoperative vestibular status, but nei-

ther showed a statistically significant difference

(

P

5

1.00 and 0.54, respectively, Fischer’s exact test).

Bilateral Progression of Menie`re’s Disease After

ITG

Two patients progressed to bilateral Menie`re’s dis-

ease after ITG. Both of them developed vertigo with

aggravation of hearing on the other side. The hearing

levels of the injected side were already worse than 60 dB

HL prior to ITG and were not aggravated after injection

in both patients. Physical examination and the caloric

test revealed apparently successful ablation of vestibular

function on the injected side. One patient developed con-

tralateral Menie`re’s disease at 2 years after ITG, and

the other patient developed it at 5 years after ITG.

DISCUSSION

Previously, the effectiveness of ITG was commonly

highlighted, with little discussion of its limitation.

7–12

The reason for failure is important because there could

be some substantial limitation to drug passage through

the round window membrane. In previous studies, mark-

edly limited permeability or impermeability was

reported in approximately 20% of cases.

16

In another

study that directly visualized the passage of gadolinium

injected into the tympanic cavity into the inner ear, 13%

showed poor drug passage through the round window

membrane, with 5% of cases showing no permeability.

17

This is very similar to our failure rate for ITG.

The tympanum was inspected for any possible ana-

tomical barrier around the oval window and/or the

round window membrane that might limit the access of

gentamicin. However, no obvious barrier such as muco-

sal folds, mucosal thickening, or bone chips was evident,

except a prominent bony overhang over the round win-

dow in two patients. Such a prominent bony overhang

could be a possible reason for the failure of ITG, accord-

ing to a previous report,

14

because vestibular function

was attenuated substantially and recurrent vertigo

attacks were controlled after ETG in a patient. However,

the reasons for the failure, especially in the two cases

who needed additional labyrinthectomy, remain unclear.

The permeability of the round window membrane is

determined by several factors, such as the thickness of

the membrane, the size of the particles, concentration,

liposolubility, and electrical charge.

18

Considering that

most of the listed variables were almost identical

TABLE III.

Summary of Patients Undergoing Labyrinthectomies and Vestibular Neurectomies.

Pt

CP Before ITG

CP After ITG

CP After ETG

Class*

Dx

Comments

1

75%

No ETG

A

MD

Labyrinthectomy

1

STP

2

77%

83% (3 inj

)

No ETG

A

EH

Labyrinthectomy

(intralabyrinthine schwannoma)

3

15%

28% (3 inj

)

32%

A

EH

Labyrinthectomy

4

4%

31% (3 inj

)

29%

A

MD

Labyrinthectomy

5

44%

89% (4 inj

)

No ETG

A

MD

Vestibular neurectomy

*Functional classification according to the 1995 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery guideline.

Surgery to control chronic otitis media.

Number of intratympanic injections of gentamicin.

CP

5

canal paresis on bithermal caloric test; Dx

5

diagnosis; EH

5

secondary endolymphatic hydrops; ETG

5

exploratory tympanotomy and gentamicin

application; ITG

5

intratympanic gentamicin injection; MD

5

definite Menie` re’s disease; Pt

5

patient; STP

5

subtotal petrosectomy.

Laryngoscope 125: April 2015

Rah et al.: Intractable Menie` re’s Disease

51