Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  77 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 77 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

1) ‘‘endolymphatic sac surgery for Me´nie`re’s disease’’; 2)

‘‘endolymphatic sac surgery’’; 3) ‘‘surgery for Me´nie`re’s dis-

ease’’; 4) MeSH ‘‘Me´nie`re’s disease/surgery.’’ This resulted in a

total of 4,262 abstracts and manuscripts that were subjected to our

inclusion and exclusion criteria (Fig. 1A). Our search is graphi-

cally depicted in an algorithmic format (Fig. 1B).

Endpoints

Primary endpoint defined as postoperative vertigo control was

evaluated using the AAO-HNS guidelines (1,2). Categories A/B

were grouped together and represented either ‘‘complete vertigo

control’’ or ‘‘substantial vertigo control.’’ These categories were

combined because Category B is generally viewed as a success

as it represents a substantial reduction (99%

Y

60%) in vertigi-

nous attacks. Also, patients with Category B vertigo control

typically report great improvement in quality of life and func-

tional level (29).

Secondary endpoint defined as postoperative hearing preser-

vation was evaluated using the AAO-HNS guidelines (1,2). Mean

pure-tone audiometry (PTA) threshold changes were calculated

and were categorized either as ‘‘improved’’/‘‘stable’’ (postoper-

ative thresholds within 10 dB of preoperative levels) or ‘‘wors-

ened’’ (postoperative levels

9

10 dB of preoperative levels).

Further, weighted mean PTA

$

dB (500, 1,000, and 2,000 Hz)

was calculated for each ESS subtype.

Both primary and secondary endpoints were evaluated for

short-term and long-term results, defined as more than 12 and

more than 24 months of follow-up, respectively.

Data Extraction

Data from studies meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria

were extracted and verified by a second author. Information

extracted from each study included author, year of publication,

number of patients studied, mean length of follow-up, and any

reported preoperative and postoperative outcomes.

FIG. 2.

Vertigo control: Forest plot for endolymphatic sac de-

compression with Category A/B vertigo control at a minimum of

12 months of follow-up.

FIG. 3.

Hearing outcomes: Forest plot for endolymphatic sac

decompression with hearing improved or stable at a minimum of

12 months of follow-up.

FIG. 4.

Vertigo control: Forest plot for mastoid shunt (including

both

with

and

without

silastic sheeting) with Category A/B vertigo

control at a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. +ss indicates with

silastic sheeting;

j

ss, without silastic sheeting.

FIG. 5.

Hearing outcomes: Forest plot for mastoid shunt (including

both

with

and

without

silastic sheeting) with hearing improved or

stable at a minimum of 12 months of follow-up.

ENDOLYMPHATIC SAC SURGERY FOR ME´ NIE` RE

_

S DISEASE

Otology & Neurotology, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2014

56