Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  168 / 822 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 168 / 822 Next Page
Page Background

PHILOSOPHY

Eternal India

encyclopedia

which is regarded as one of the sources of the

Vedanta

philosophy.

The Gita mainly epitomises the teachings of Krishna, the eighth in-

carnation of Vishnu. Before the advent of Krishna the teachings of

the

Upanishads

had been misinterpreted. The ideal of renunciation

of worldly things with which the

Upanishads

are permeated, not

being correctly understood, had led to belief in passivity as the

supreme state. Krishna gives the correct interpretation of the teach-

ings of the Upanishads to his disciple, Arjuna, who turns to him for

counsel. Renunciation, he points out, is renunciation not of the world

but wordliness, not of actions but of desires.

Karma

(literally deed)

leads to bondage if it increases the weight of desires and inflates the

ego. It leads to freedom if it helps to deny the self or to free one

from attachment to the fruits of action.

Krishna offers a way of spiritual life in which all can participate

according to each person's place in the class system. All men sur-

rendering themselves to the Divine will should fulfil their respective

duties (

svadharma

) in accordance with that scheme which is designed

by God in accordance with the varying propensities and capacities

of different people and is not arbitrary. "Better is one's

dharma

which

one may be able to fulfil but imperfectly than the

dharma

of others

which is more easily accomplished. Better is death in the fulfilment

of one's own

dharma.

The

dharma

of others is perilous..."

The Gita teaches that man has a duty to promote

lokasangraha

or the stability, solidarity and progress of society. The activism of

the Gita is not of the common variety. It argues that action, as such,

is not detrimental to one's attainment of spiritual goals. It is only

one's attachment to the fruits of action that keeps one eternally in-

volved in the cycle of birth and death. The Gita teaches the art of

acting without being personally involved in the action. The teach-

ing of the

Bhagavad Gita

is summed up in the maxim: "Your

business is with the deed, and not with the result."

The Gita expounds the various methods of attaining union

(yoga)

with God. They are

jnana yoga

, the path of union through knowledge,

bhakti yoga,

the path of realisation through love and devotion and

karma yoga,

the path of union through work. A devotee (

bhakta)

who surrenders himself to the Divine compels God to become his

friend and guide. Krishna states that a true practitioner of the yoga

of action (

karmayogin

) also becomes a true devotee for by follow-

ing his own duty (

svadharma

), the Karmayogin is doing the will of

God. There is no hard and fast line between one way and another.

The Gita treats

yoga

which stands not only for the goal of spiritual

life but also for the way leading to it as one organic whole though

for purposes of exposition, it often isolates and dwells upon one

aspect of it to the exclusion of the others. The Gita achieves a

synthesis of various schools of religious thought and various ways

and means of spiritual life — such as

karma yoga, bhakti yoga

and

jnana yoga.

VEDANTA

Vedanta

became from the time of Shankaracharya (C. 788-820

A.D.) the dominant philosophy of India. Shankara, a Brahmin bom

in Kerala, became famous as the new interpreter of the

Vedanta

school and propagator of the monistic or non-dualistic

Advaita

("allowing no second" i.e. monism) school of

Vedanta.

Later inter-

pretations of the

Vedanta

were those of the Ramanuja school of

qualified nondualism (

Visistadvaita

) and of Madhwa who expounded

a more theistic and pluralistic

(Dvaita)

interpretation of

Vedanta.

The exact nature of the relation between the Supreme Being and

the individual soul is the central theme in these systems. In the

Vedanta Sutras

the sages Ashmarathya, Audulomi and Kashakritsna

hold different views on this question. The first held that the indi-

vidual souls like sparks issuing from a fire were neither different

from Brahman nor non-different from it. The second held that the

individual souls are different from the Supreme but ultimately become

one with the Supreme. The third held that it is the Supreme soul

that exists also as the individual soul. Shankara followed the third

view, that of Kashakritsna, and expounded the identity of the two,

of the individual soul as a state of the Supreme. Shankara main-

tained that the world we see round us is an illusion (

maya

), a dream,

a figment of the imagination. Ultimately, the only reality was

Brah-

man,

the impersonal World Soul of the

Upanishads

with which the

individual soul was identical.

Absolute nonduality, the absolute unity of the individual soul and

Brahman,

is basic to Shankara's philosophy. All plurality, the world

of thought and matter, is seen as unreal and as superimposed upon

the absolute unqualified

Brahman

which is one without a second.

When Shankara says that the world of thought and matter is not real,

he does not mean that it is non-existent. The world is and is not.

It is neither real nor unreal. This paradox simply recognises the

existence of what Shankara calls

maya.

Superimposition (

vivar-

tavada

) is inseparably linked with causality. Causal relation exists

in the world of multiplicity which is

maya. Maya,

like

Brahman,

is without beginning. Ignorance

(avidya)as

the cause and the appar-

ent world as the effect have always existed and will always exist.

Similarly, the individual soul, which appears different from other

souls and also from Brahman is in fact nothing but the one unitary

Brahman. Since ignorance lies at the root of the seeming duality,

knowledge alone is regarded as the means to liberation. Religious

activities and devotion have only a secondary function. They may

direct the mind to knowledge but in themselves can never bring about

liberation. Brahman may be regarded as possessing attributes of a

personalised God (

Iswara

). Devotion to Iswara purifies the mind and

prepares it for the higher knowledge of the unqualified Brahman.

Max Muller has said:

"Vedanta

holds a most unique position

among the philosophies of the world. After lifting the self or the

true nature of the Ego,

Vedanta

unites it with the essence of Divinity,

which is absolutely pure, perfect, immortal, unchangeable and one.

No philosopher, not even Plato, Spinoza, Kant, Hegel or Schopen-

hauer, has reached that height of philosophic thought. None of our

philosophers, not excepting Heraclitus, Plato, Kant, or Hegel has

ventured to erect such a spire, never frightened by storms or light-

nings. Stone follows upon stone, in regular succession after once the

first step has been made, after once it has been clearly seen that in

the beginning there can have been but One, as there will be but One

in the end, whether we call it

Atman

or

Brahman

." He closed one

of his lectures on the

Vedanta

with these words: "In one half-verse

I shall tell you what has been taught in thousands of volumes:

Brahman

is true, the world is false, the soul is

Brahman

and nothing

else",

Ramanuja (C. 1017-1137) stressed devotion (

bhakti

) rather than

knowledge as the chief means of salvation and qualified Shankara's

non-dualism by declaring that the individual soul was one with God,

made by God out of his own essence but yet distinct. The sentient

and non-sentient universe constitute the body of the Supreme Being

whose chief attribute is intelligence. This latter conception of the